Release 4B 5

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v4.3.0: R4B (v5.0.0: R5 - STU ). The This is the current published version which supercedes in it's permanent home (it will always be available at this version is 5.0.0 . URL). For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R5 R4B R4 R3 R2

Riskassessment-example-prognosis.xml

Example RiskAssessment/prognosis (XML)

Clinical Decision Support Work Group Maturity Level : N/A Standards Status : Informative Compartments : Device , Patient , Practitioner

Raw XML ( canonical form + also see XML Format Specification )

Jump past Narrative

Patient prognosis (id = "prognosis") 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


 
  
    
    
      
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
    
    
  
  
    
      
        
        
      
      
    
    
      
        
        
        
      
    
  

<RiskAssessment xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
 <id value="prognosis"/> 
  <text> 
    <status value="additional"/> 
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p> Moderate risk of permanent weakness of the left arm, but otherwise no permanent
         disability</p> 
    </div>   </text>   <status value="final"/>   <subject>     <reference value="Patient/example"/>   </subject>   <occurrenceDateTime value="2010-11-22"/>   <condition>     <reference value="Condition/stroke"/>     <display value="Ischemic Stroke"/>   </condition>   <prediction>     <outcome>       <coding>         <system value="http://snomed.info/sct"/>         <code value="249943000:363698007=72098002,260868000=6934004"/>       </coding>       <text value="permanent weakness of the left arm"/>     </outcome>     <qualitativeRisk>       <coding>         <system value="http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/risk-probability"/>         <code value="moderate"/>         <display value="moderate likelihood"/>       </coding>     </qualitativeRisk>   </prediction> 


</

RiskAssessment

>

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.