This
page
is
part
of
the
FHIR
Specification
(v4.0.1:
R4
(v5.0.0:
R5
-
Mixed
Normative
and
STU
)
).
This
is
the
current
published
version
in
it's
permanent
home
(it
will
always
be
available
at
this
URL).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R5
R4B
R4
R3
R2
| Patient Care Work Group | Maturity Level : N/A | Standards Status : Informative | Compartments : Encounter , Patient , Practitioner , RelatedPerson |
This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML , JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile Condition .
Generated
Narrative
with
Details
Narrative:
Condition
Resource Condition "f002"
clinicalStatus
:
Active
(Details
:
{http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-clinical
code
'active'
=
'Active)
(
Condition
Clinical
Status
Codes
#active)
verificationStatus
:
Confirmed
(Details
:
{http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-ver-status
code
'confirmed'
=
'Confirmed)
(
ConditionVerificationStatus
#confirmed)
category
:
diagnosis
(Details
:
{SNOMED
(
SNOMED
CT
code
'439401001'
=
'Diagnosis',
given
as
'diagnosis'})
#439401001)
severity
:
Severe
(Details
:
{SNOMED
(
SNOMED
CT
code
'24484000'
=
'Severe',
given
as
'Severe'})
#24484000)
code
:
NSCLC
-
Non-small
cell
lung
cancer
(Details
:
{SNOMED
(
SNOMED
CT
code
'254637007'
=
'Non-small
cell
lung
cancer',
given
as
'NSCLC
-
Non-small
cell
lung
cancer'})
#254637007)
bodySite
:
Thorax
(Details
:
{SNOMED
(
SNOMED
CT
code
'51185008'
=
'Thorax',
given
as
'Thorax'})
#51185008)
subject : Patient/f001: P. van de Heuvel "Pieter VAN DE HEUVEL"
encounter : Encounter/f002
onset
:
05/05/2011
2011-05-05
recordedDate
:
03/06/2012
2012-06-03
| - |
| Actor |
| * | Informant ( Provenance participant type #informant) | Patient/f001: P. van de Heuvel "Pieter VAN DE HEUVEL" |
| - | Summary | Type |
| * |
stage
II
|
Clinical
staging
(qualifier
value)
|
| - |
|
| * |
CT
of
thorax
|
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.