This
page
is
part
of
the
FHIR
Specification
(v4.0.1:
R4
(v5.0.0:
R5
-
Mixed
Normative
and
STU
)
).
This
is
the
current
published
version
in
it's
permanent
home
(it
will
always
be
available
at
this
URL).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R5
R4B
R4
Work
Group
Clinical
Decision
Support
|
Maturity Level : 2 | Standards Status : Trial Use |
Part of defining knowledge artifacts such as order sets, protocols, and decision support rules is describing in a patient- or context-independent way the activities to be performed. For example, when defining an order set, the orderable items must be described with enough detail to enable the creation of the items when the order set is applied. These descriptions can be thought of as templates for the creation of patient- or context-specific resources and are often referred to as definitional resources, to distinguish them from intent resources (that signal an intention to take some action for a specific patient), as well as event resources (that signal that some action has actually been taken for a patient).
In the most general case, these definitional resources only need to describe the most basic aspects of the activity to be performed, such as:
However, this level of conceptual description often does not carry enough information to enable computable description of activities. For example, medication activities will often involve specific drug and dosage information that must be captured as part of the definition. Further, it is often the case that the values for the elements of resources to be created cannot be specified exactly as part of the definition, but must be specified using a formula that allows for the calculation to be based on patient- or context-specific information.
Note to implementers: Although there are currently very few definitional resources defined (ActivityDefinition, ObservationDefinition, SpecimenDefinition), the concept is general, and this is a deliberate design decision to avoid the overhead of defining and maintaining a different definitional resource for every category of request. We anticipate that as the use cases of ActivityDefinition require more specialized elements to be added, additional definitional resources may be defined.
The ActivityDefinition resource supports the description of definitional resources within FHIR:
| Who | participantType | Specifies the type of participant that should perform the activity. |
| What | kind and code | Specifies the type of activity to be performed. |
| When | timing | Specifies when the activity should be performed. |
| Where | location | Specifies where the activity should be performed. |
| Why | reason, documentation | Specifies why the activity should be performed. |
For example, the following fragment illustrates a definition to create a referral request:
<ActivityDefinition>
<description value="refer to primary care mental-health integrated care program for evaluation and treatment
of mental health conditions now"/>
<kind value="ServiceRequest"/>
<code>
<coding>
<system value="http://snomed.info/sct"/>
<code value="306206005"/>
</coding>
</code>
<timingTiming>
<event>
<extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/cqf-expression">
<valueExpression>
<language value="text/cql"/>
<expression value="Now()"/>
</valueExpression>
</extension>
</event>
</timingTiming>
<participantType value="practitioner"/>
</ActivityDefinition>
Note
the
use
of
an
expression
to
represent
the
value
of
the
timing
element
as
Now()
.
For
medication
activities,
the
ActivityDefinition
resource
has
some
basic
elements
such
as
the
product
and
quantity
,
and
dosageInstruction
but
there
are
cases
where
elements
that
need
to
be
set
on
the
resulting
MedicationRequest
are
not
present
on
the
ActivityDefinition
(such
as
dispenseRequest
).
In
those
cases,
the
dynamicValue
expression
elements
can
be
used
to
describe
the
values
for
elements
that
are
present
on
the
target
resource,
but
not
in
the
definitional
resource.
For
example:
<ActivityDefinition>
<id value="citalopramPrescription"/>
<status value="draft"/>
<category value="drug"/>
<productReference>
<reference value="#citalopramMedication"/>
</productReference>
<dynamicValue>
<path value="dispenseRequest.numberOfRepeatsAllowed"/>
<expression>
<language value="text/cql"/>
<expression value="3"/>
</expression>
</dynamicValue>
<dynamicValue>
<path value="dispenseRequest.quantity"/>
<expression>
<language value="text/cql"/>
<expression value="30 '{tbl}'"/>
</expression>
</dynamicValue>
</ActivityDefinition>
Note
The
ObservationDefinition
resource
supports
the
definition
of
an
observation
to
implementers:
Although
there
is
currently
only
one
definitional
be
taken.
The
SpecimenDefinition
resource
defined
(ActivityDefinition),
supports
the
concept
is
general,
and
this
was
definition
of
a
deliberate
design
decision
specimen
to
avoid
be
collected.
The
MessageDefinition
resource
supports
the
overhead
definition
of
defining
and
maintaining
a
different
definitional
message
to
be
communicated.
NOTE:
This
is
a
system-level
message,
as
opposed
to
a
human-to-human
message,
which
would
be
modeled
using
the
CommunicationRequest
and
Communication
resources.
The
Questionnaire
resource
can
be
used
to
directly
support
describing
information
to
be
collected
as
part
of
a
process.
The
Structured
Data
Capture
implementation
guide
provides
detailed
information
for
every
category
supporting
this
use
case.
Note
that
the
ActivityDefinition
resource
is
specifically
designed
to
support
request
resources,
typically
with
an
intent
of
request.
We
anticipate
proposal
to
ensure
that
clinician
interaction
can
be
part
of
interpreting
the
results
of
any
automated
reasoning
processes.
However,
it
is
possible
to
construct
event
resources
as
part
of
the
reasoning
process,
such
as
Observations,
Procedures,
RiskAssessments,
DetectedIssues,
etc.
To
support
this
case,
implementations
should
make
use
cases
of
ActivityDefinition
require
more
specialized
elements
to
a
Task
resource
with
proposal
intent,
where
the
focus
of
the
Task
would
be
added,
the
computed
event
resource.
The
EvidenceVariable
resource
may
supports
the
description
of
definitional
resources
for
variables
to
be
split.
referenced
from
an
Evidence
resource:
| Who | topic | Could specify the category of evidence variable (eg condition, exposure); available for future uses |
| What | characteristic.definition[x] | Specifies a component of the definition of the evidence variable |
| When | characteristic.timeFromStart | Subelement of characteristic to specify when the definitional component was or will be determined |
| Where | type | Specifies the type of variable (eg dichotomous. Categorical, continuous, descriptive) |
| How | Characteristic.method | Specifies how the definitional component was or will be determined |
For example, the following fragment illustrates a definition of "intracranial hemorrhage within 7 days" as a characteristic from an EvidenceVariable instance:
<characteristic>
<description value="intracranial hemorrhage within 7 days"/>
<definitionCodeableConcept>
<coding>
<system value="http://snomed.info/sct"/>
<code value="1386000"/>
<display value="Intracranial hemorrhage (disorder)"/>
</coding>
</definitionCodeableConcept>
<timeFromStart>
<description value="within 7 days"/>
<range>
<low>
<value value="0"/>
<unit value="day"/>
<system value="http://unitsofmeasure.org"/>
<code value="d"/>
</low>
<high>
<value value="7"/>
<unit value="day"/>
<system value="http://unitsofmeasure.org"/>
<code value="d"/>
</high>
</range>
</timeFromStart>
</characteristic>