This
page
is
part
of
the
FHIR
Specification
(v4.0.1:
R4
(v4.3.0:
R4B
-
Mixed
Normative
and
STU
)
in
it's
permanent
home
(it
will
always
be
available
at
this
URL).
).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R5
R4B
R4
R4B
R4
R3
R2
Vocabulary
Work
Group
|
Maturity Level : 3 | Trial Use | Security Category : Anonymous | Compartments : Not linked to any defined compartments |
A statement of relationships from one set of concepts to one or more other concepts - either concepts in code systems, or data element/data element concepts, or classes in class models.
ConceptMap will have significant changes in R5. The R5 CI build version of ConceptMap can be found here: http://build.fhir.org/conceptmap.html.
A concept map defines a mapping from a set of concepts defined in a code system (commonly referred to as the "system") to one or more concepts defined in other code systems. In the mapping context, a system can be a typical code system based on a recognized standard or local terminology (in any of its forms), or in some cases it may be an "implicit" code system that is not based on a recognized terminology but still represents a set of "concepts" that can be usefully mapped. Mappings are one way - from the source to the target system. In many cases, the reverse mappings are valid, but this cannot be assumed to be the case.
Mappings between code system concepts are only intended to be defined in the context of a particular business usage. The business use case is normally defined by the specification of the source and target value sets. The mappings may be useful in other contexts, but this must be determined based on the context of use and meaning; it cannot be taken for granted automatically. An example where the usage context is important for choosing the correct mapping is mapping from a clinical terminology (e.g. SNOMED CT) to a classification (e.g. ICD-10) for either data analysis or billing. Mappings in the data analysis context would be targeted for an appropriate classification (often at a higher level), whereas in the billing context there may be specific requirements to be met (e.g. leaf level codes only) that could result in multiple mappings for a single source concept and then require additional information beyond the source concept itself in order to select the correct final mapping.
Note that all code systems (explicit or implicit) represented in FHIR have URI identifiers for value sets (also either explicit or implicit) that include the entire code system, and these "all codes" value sets can be used for mappings that are valid in all use contexts that are appropriate for the code system.
Each
mapping
for
a
concept
from
the
source
to
target
system
includes
an
equivalence
property
that
specifies
how
similar
the
mapping
is
(or,
in
some
cases,
that
there
is
no
valid
mapping).
There
is
one
element
for
each
concept
or
field
in
the
source
value
set
or
system
that
needs
to
be
mapped.
Each
source
concept
may
have
multiple
targets:
There SHOULD be at least one target for each element, but some incomplete concept maps might not have a target for each concept.
A key concept for the ConceptMap resource is the $translate operation . This operation is a formal definition of an API by which a terminology server can allow clients to ask for a translation to be done based on the content in the ConceptMap resource. As such it also provides useful perspective on the operational use of ConceptMap resources in any context.
While
ConceptMap
resources
are
not
referred
to
directly
from
any
other
resource,
they
may
be
included
and
used
in
ImplementationGuide
resources,
and
provide
background
knowledge
that
is
useful
in
many
contexts,
including
operations
defined
in
this
specification.
In
addition
to
ConceptMap
,
there
is
also
the
StructureMap
resource.
The
ConceptMap
resource
defines
relationships
between
concepts
in
their
own
right,
along
with
grading
of
their
equivalencies,
while
the
StructureMap
defines
an
executable
transform
for
instances
that
conform
to
a
known
structure.
Both Code System supplements and Concept Maps may be used to define relationships between concepts in different systems. ConceptMaps are assertions of the relationships between different concepts that are associated with particular contexts of use, while CodeSystem supplements are used to define inherent properties and semantics of the concepts in the code system
Further
discussion
of
the
issues
involved
in
mapping
between
concept
definition
systems
can
be
found
in
the
HL7
v3
Core
Principles
document
and
the
functionality
described
in
the
OMG
CTS
2
specification.
This
resource
is
referenced
by
itself
itself.
This resource does not implement any patterns.
Structure
| Name | Flags | Card. | Type |
Description
&
Constraints
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
DomainResource |
A
map
from
one
set
of
concepts
to
one
or
more
other
concepts
+ Warning: Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation Elements defined in Ancestors: id , meta , implicitRules , language , text , contained , extension , modifierExtension |
|
|
Σ | 0..1 | uri | Canonical identifier for this concept map, represented as a URI (globally unique) |
|
Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | Additional identifier for the concept map |
|
Σ | 0..1 | string | Business version of the concept map |
|
Σ
|
0..1 | string | Name for this concept map (computer friendly) |
|
Σ | 0..1 | string | Name for this concept map (human friendly) |
|
?! Σ | 1..1 | code |
draft
|
active
|
retired
|
unknown
PublicationStatus ( Required ) |
|
Σ | 0..1 | boolean | For testing purposes, not real usage |
|
Σ | 0..1 | dateTime | Date last changed |
|
Σ | 0..1 | string | Name of the publisher (organization or individual) |
|
Σ | 0..* | ContactDetail |
Contact
details
for
the
publisher
|
|
0..1 | markdown | Natural language description of the concept map | |
|
Σ | 0..* | UsageContext |
The
context
that
the
content
is
intended
to
support
|
|
Σ | 0..* | CodeableConcept |
Intended
jurisdiction
for
concept
map
(if
applicable)
Jurisdiction ( Extensible ) |
|
0..1 | markdown | Why this concept map is defined | |
|
0..1 | markdown | Use and/or publishing restrictions | |
|
Σ | 0..1 | The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped | |
|
uri | |||
|
canonical ( ValueSet ) | |||
|
Σ | 0..1 | The target value set which provides context for the mappings | |
|
uri | |||
|
canonical ( ValueSet ) | |||
|
0..* | BackboneElement |
Same
source
and
target
systems
|
|
|
0..1 | uri | Source system where concepts to be mapped are defined | |
|
0..1 | string | Specific version of the code system | |
|
0..1 | uri | Target system that the concepts are to be mapped to | |
|
0..1 | string | Specific version of the code system | |
|
1..* | BackboneElement |
Mappings
for
a
concept
from
the
source
set
|
|
|
0..1 | code | Identifies element being mapped | |
|
0..1 | string | Display for the code | |
|
I | 0..* | BackboneElement |
Concept
in
target
system
for
element
+ Rule: If the map is narrower or inexact, there SHALL be some comments |
|
0..1 | code | Code that identifies the target element | |
|
0..1 | string | Display for the code | |
|
?! | 1..1 | code |
relatedto
|
equivalent
|
equal
|
wider
|
subsumes
|
narrower
|
specializes
|
inexact
|
unmatched
|
disjoint
ConceptMapEquivalence ( Required ) |
|
I | 0..1 | string | Description of status/issues in mapping |
|
0..* | BackboneElement |
Other
elements
required
for
this
mapping
(from
context)
|
|
|
1..1 | uri | Reference to property mapping depends on | |
|
0..1 | canonical ( CodeSystem ) | Code System (if necessary) | |
|
1..1 | string | Value of the referenced element | |
|
0..1 | string | Display for the code (if value is a code) | |
|
0..* | see dependsOn |
Other
concepts
that
this
mapping
also
produces
|
|
|
I | 0..1 | BackboneElement |
What
to
do
when
there
is
no
mapping
for
the
source
concept
+ Rule: If the mode is 'fixed', a code must be provided + Rule: If the mode is 'other-map', a url must be provided |
|
1..1 | code |
provided
|
fixed
|
other-map
ConceptMapGroupUnmappedMode ( Required ) |
|
|
0..1 | code | Fixed code when mode = fixed | |
|
0..1 | string | Display for the code | |
|
0..1 | canonical ( ConceptMap ) | canonical reference to an additional ConceptMap to use for mapping if the source concept is unmapped | |
Documentation
for
this
format
|
||||
UML Diagram ( Legend )
XML Template
<ConceptMap xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"><!-- from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language --> <!-- from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension --> <url value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Canonical identifier for this concept map, represented as a URI (globally unique) --> <identifier><!-- 0..1 Identifier Additional identifier for the concept map --></identifier> <version value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Business version of the concept map -->
<<name value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Name for this concept map (computer friendly) --> <title value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Name for this concept map (human friendly) --> <status value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 draft | active | retired | unknown --> <experimental value="[boolean]"/><!-- 0..1 For testing purposes, not real usage --> <date value="[dateTime]"/><!-- 0..1 Date last changed --> <publisher value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Name of the publisher (organization or individual) --> <contact><!-- 0..* ContactDetail Contact details for the publisher --></contact> <description value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Natural language description of the concept map --> <useContext><!-- 0..* UsageContext The context that the content is intended to support --></useContext> <jurisdiction><!-- 0..* CodeableConcept Intended jurisdiction for concept map (if applicable) --></jurisdiction> <purpose value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Why this concept map is defined --> <copyright value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Use and/or publishing restrictions --> <source[x]><!-- 0..1 uri|canonical(ValueSet) The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped --></source[x]> <target[x]><!-- 0..1 uri|canonical(ValueSet) The target value set which provides context for the mappings --></target[x]> <group> <!-- 0..* Same source and target systems --> <source value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Source system where concepts to be mapped are defined --> <sourceVersion value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Specific version of the code system --> <target value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Target system that the concepts are to be mapped to --> <targetVersion value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Specific version of the code system --> <element> <!-- 1..* Mappings for a concept from the source set --> <code value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 Identifies element being mapped --> <display value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Display for the code --> <target> <!-- 0..* Concept in target system for element --> <code value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 Code that identifies the target element --> <display value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Display for the code --> <equivalence value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 relatedto | equivalent | equal | wider | subsumes | narrower | specializes | inexact | unmatched | disjoint --> <comment value="[string]"/><!--0..1 Description of status/issues in mapping --> <dependsOn> <!-- 0..* Other elements required for this mapping (from context) --> <property value="[uri]"/><!-- 1..1 Reference to property mapping depends on --> <system><!-- 0..1 canonical(CodeSystem) Code System (if necessary) --></system> <value value="[string]"/><!-- 1..1 Value of the referenced element --> <display value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Display for the code (if value is a code) --> </dependsOn> <product><!-- 0..* Content as for ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn Other concepts that this mapping also produces --></product> </target> </element> <unmapped> <!-- 0..1 What to do when there is no mapping for the source concept --> <mode value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 provided | fixed | other-map --> <code value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 Fixed code when mode = fixed --> <display value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Display for the code --> <url><!-- 0..1 canonical(ConceptMap) canonical reference to an additional ConceptMap to use for mapping if the source concept is unmapped --></url> </unmapped> </group> </ConceptMap>
JSON Template
{
"resourceType" : "ConceptMap",
// from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language
// from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension
"url" : "<uri>", // Canonical identifier for this concept map, represented as a URI (globally unique)
"identifier" : { Identifier }, // Additional identifier for the concept map
"version" : "<string>", // Business version of the concept map
"
"name" : "<string>", // Name for this concept map (computer friendly)
"title" : "<string>", // Name for this concept map (human friendly)
"status" : "<code>", // R! draft | active | retired | unknown
"experimental" : <boolean>, // For testing purposes, not real usage
"date" : "<dateTime>", // Date last changed
"publisher" : "<string>", // Name of the publisher (organization or individual)
"contact" : [{ ContactDetail }], // Contact details for the publisher
"description" : "<markdown>", // Natural language description of the concept map
"useContext" : [{ UsageContext }], // The context that the content is intended to support
"jurisdiction" : [{ CodeableConcept }], // Intended jurisdiction for concept map (if applicable)
"purpose" : "<markdown>", // Why this concept map is defined
"copyright" : "<markdown>", // Use and/or publishing restrictions
// source[x]: The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped. One of these 2:
"sourceUri" : "<uri>",
"sourceCanonical" : { canonical(ValueSet) },
// target[x]: The target value set which provides context for the mappings. One of these 2:
"targetUri" : "<uri>",
"targetCanonical" : { canonical(ValueSet) },
"group" : [{ // Same source and target systems
"source" : "<uri>", // Source system where concepts to be mapped are defined
"sourceVersion" : "<string>", // Specific version of the code system
"target" : "<uri>", // Target system that the concepts are to be mapped to
"targetVersion" : "<string>", // Specific version of the code system
"element" : [{ // R! Mappings for a concept from the source set
"code" : "<code>", // Identifies element being mapped
"display" : "<string>", // Display for the code
"target" : [{ // Concept in target system for element
"code" : "<code>", // Code that identifies the target element
"display" : "<string>", // Display for the code
"equivalence" : "<code>", // R! relatedto | equivalent | equal | wider | subsumes | narrower | specializes | inexact | unmatched | disjoint
"comment" : "<string>", // C? Description of status/issues in mapping
"dependsOn" : [{ // Other elements required for this mapping (from context)
"property" : "<uri>", // R! Reference to property mapping depends on
"system" : { canonical(CodeSystem) }, // Code System (if necessary)
"value" : "<string>", // R! Value of the referenced element
"display" : "<string>" // Display for the code (if value is a code)
}],
"product" : [{ Content as for ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn }] // Other concepts that this mapping also produces
}]
}],
"unmapped" : { // What to do when there is no mapping for the source concept
"mode" : "<code>", // R! provided | fixed | other-map
"code" : "<code>", // Fixed code when mode = fixed
"display" : "<string>", // Display for the code
"url" : { canonical(ConceptMap) } // canonical reference to an additional ConceptMap to use for mapping if the source concept is unmapped
}
}]
}
Turtle Template
@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .[ a fhir:ConceptMap; fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot; # if this is the parser root # from Resource: .id, .meta, .implicitRules, and .language # from DomainResource: .text, .contained, .extension, and .modifierExtension fhir:ConceptMap.url [ uri ]; # 0..1 Canonical identifier for this concept map, represented as a URI (globally unique) fhir:ConceptMap.identifier [ Identifier ]; # 0..1 Additional identifier for the concept map fhir:ConceptMap.version [ string ]; # 0..1 Business version of the concept map fhir:ConceptMap.name [ string ]; # 0..1 Name for this concept map (computer friendly) fhir:ConceptMap.title [ string ]; # 0..1 Name for this concept map (human friendly) fhir:ConceptMap.status [ code ]; # 1..1 draft | active | retired | unknown fhir:ConceptMap.experimental [ boolean ]; # 0..1 For testing purposes, not real usage fhir:ConceptMap.date [ dateTime ]; # 0..1 Date last changed fhir:ConceptMap.publisher [ string ]; # 0..1 Name of the publisher (organization or individual) fhir:ConceptMap.contact [ ContactDetail ], ... ; # 0..* Contact details for the publisher fhir:ConceptMap.description [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Natural language description of the concept map fhir:ConceptMap.useContext [ UsageContext ], ... ; # 0..* The context that the content is intended to support fhir:ConceptMap.jurisdiction [ CodeableConcept ], ... ; # 0..* Intended jurisdiction for concept map (if applicable) fhir:ConceptMap.purpose [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Why this concept map is defined fhir:ConceptMap.copyright [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Use and/or publishing restrictions # ConceptMap.source[x] : 0..1 The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped. One of these 2 fhir:ConceptMap.sourceUri [ uri ] fhir:ConceptMap.sourceCanonical [ canonical(ValueSet) ] # ConceptMap.target[x] : 0..1 The target value set which provides context for the mappings. One of these 2 fhir:ConceptMap.targetUri [ uri ] fhir:ConceptMap.targetCanonical [ canonical(ValueSet) ] fhir:ConceptMap.group [ # 0..* Same source and target systems fhir:ConceptMap.group.source [ uri ]; # 0..1 Source system where concepts to be mapped are defined fhir:ConceptMap.group.sourceVersion [ string ]; # 0..1 Specific version of the code system fhir:ConceptMap.group.target [ uri ]; # 0..1 Target system that the concepts are to be mapped to fhir:ConceptMap.group.targetVersion [ string ]; # 0..1 Specific version of the code system fhir:ConceptMap.group.element [ # 1..* Mappings for a concept from the source set fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.code [ code ]; # 0..1 Identifies element being mapped fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.display [ string ]; # 0..1 Display for the code fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target [ # 0..* Concept in target system for element fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.code [ code ]; # 0..1 Code that identifies the target element fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.display [ string ]; # 0..1 Display for the code fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.equivalence [ code ]; # 1..1 relatedto | equivalent | equal | wider | subsumes | narrower | specializes | inexact | unmatched | disjoint fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.comment [ string ]; # 0..1 Description of status/issues in mapping fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn [ # 0..* Other elements required for this mapping (from context) fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn.property [ uri ]; # 1..1 Reference to property mapping depends on fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn.system [ canonical(CodeSystem) ]; # 0..1 Code System (if necessary) fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn.value [ string ]; # 1..1 Value of the referenced element fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn.display [ string ]; # 0..1 Display for the code (if value is a code) ], ...; fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.product [ See ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn ], ... ; # 0..* Other concepts that this mapping also produces ], ...; ], ...; fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped [ # 0..1 What to do when there is no mapping for the source concept fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped.mode [ code ]; # 1..1 provided | fixed | other-map fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped.code [ code ]; # 0..1 Fixed code when mode = fixed fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped.display [ string ]; # 0..1 Display for the code fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped.url [ canonical(ConceptMap) ]; # 0..1 canonical reference to an additional ConceptMap to use for mapping if the source concept is unmapped ]; ], ...; ]
Changes
since
R3
R4
| ConceptMap |
|
See the Full Difference for further information
This analysis is available as XML or JSON .
Conversions between R3 and R4
See R3 <--> R4 Conversion Maps (status = 4 tests that all execute ok. All tests pass round-trip testing and 4 r3 resources are invalid (0 errors). )
Structure
| Name | Flags | Card. | Type |
Description
&
Constraints
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
DomainResource |
A
map
from
one
set
of
concepts
to
one
or
more
other
concepts
+ Warning: Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation Elements defined in Ancestors: id , meta , implicitRules , language , text , contained , extension , modifierExtension |
|
|
Σ | 0..1 | uri | Canonical identifier for this concept map, represented as a URI (globally unique) |
|
Σ | 0..1 | Identifier | Additional identifier for the concept map |
|
Σ | 0..1 | string | Business version of the concept map |
|
Σ
|
0..1 | string | Name for this concept map (computer friendly) |
|
Σ | 0..1 | string | Name for this concept map (human friendly) |
|
?! Σ | 1..1 | code |
draft
|
active
|
retired
|
unknown
PublicationStatus ( Required ) |
|
Σ | 0..1 | boolean | For testing purposes, not real usage |
|
Σ | 0..1 | dateTime | Date last changed |
|
Σ | 0..1 | string | Name of the publisher (organization or individual) |
|
Σ | 0..* | ContactDetail |
Contact
details
for
the
publisher
|
|
0..1 | markdown | Natural language description of the concept map | |
|
Σ | 0..* | UsageContext |
The
context
that
the
content
is
intended
to
support
|
|
Σ | 0..* | CodeableConcept |
Intended
jurisdiction
for
concept
map
(if
applicable)
Jurisdiction ( Extensible ) |
|
0..1 | markdown | Why this concept map is defined | |
|
0..1 | markdown | Use and/or publishing restrictions | |
|
Σ | 0..1 | The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped | |
|
uri | |||
|
canonical ( ValueSet ) | |||
|
Σ | 0..1 | The target value set which provides context for the mappings | |
|
uri | |||
|
canonical ( ValueSet ) | |||
|
0..* | BackboneElement |
Same
source
and
target
systems
|
|
|
0..1 | uri | Source system where concepts to be mapped are defined | |
|
0..1 | string | Specific version of the code system | |
|
0..1 | uri | Target system that the concepts are to be mapped to | |
|
0..1 | string | Specific version of the code system | |
|
1..* | BackboneElement |
Mappings
for
a
concept
from
the
source
set
|
|
|
0..1 | code | Identifies element being mapped | |
|
0..1 | string | Display for the code | |
|
I | 0..* | BackboneElement |
Concept
in
target
system
for
element
+ Rule: If the map is narrower or inexact, there SHALL be some comments |
|
0..1 | code | Code that identifies the target element | |
|
0..1 | string | Display for the code | |
|
?! | 1..1 | code |
relatedto
|
equivalent
|
equal
|
wider
|
subsumes
|
narrower
|
specializes
|
inexact
|
unmatched
|
disjoint
ConceptMapEquivalence ( Required ) |
|
I | 0..1 | string | Description of status/issues in mapping |
|
0..* | BackboneElement |
Other
elements
required
for
this
mapping
(from
context)
|
|
|
1..1 | uri | Reference to property mapping depends on | |
|
0..1 | canonical ( CodeSystem ) | Code System (if necessary) | |
|
1..1 | string | Value of the referenced element | |
|
0..1 | string | Display for the code (if value is a code) | |
|
0..* | see dependsOn |
Other
concepts
that
this
mapping
also
produces
|
|
|
I | 0..1 | BackboneElement |
What
to
do
when
there
is
no
mapping
for
the
source
concept
+ Rule: If the mode is 'fixed', a code must be provided + Rule: If the mode is 'other-map', a url must be provided |
|
1..1 | code |
provided
|
fixed
|
other-map
ConceptMapGroupUnmappedMode ( Required ) |
|
|
0..1 | code | Fixed code when mode = fixed | |
|
0..1 | string | Display for the code | |
|
0..1 | canonical ( ConceptMap ) | canonical reference to an additional ConceptMap to use for mapping if the source concept is unmapped | |
Documentation
for
this
format
|
||||
XML Template
<ConceptMap xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"><!-- from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language --> <!-- from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension --> <url value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Canonical identifier for this concept map, represented as a URI (globally unique) --> <identifier><!-- 0..1 Identifier Additional identifier for the concept map --></identifier> <version value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Business version of the concept map -->
<<name value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Name for this concept map (computer friendly) --> <title value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Name for this concept map (human friendly) --> <status value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 draft | active | retired | unknown --> <experimental value="[boolean]"/><!-- 0..1 For testing purposes, not real usage --> <date value="[dateTime]"/><!-- 0..1 Date last changed --> <publisher value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Name of the publisher (organization or individual) --> <contact><!-- 0..* ContactDetail Contact details for the publisher --></contact> <description value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Natural language description of the concept map --> <useContext><!-- 0..* UsageContext The context that the content is intended to support --></useContext> <jurisdiction><!-- 0..* CodeableConcept Intended jurisdiction for concept map (if applicable) --></jurisdiction> <purpose value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Why this concept map is defined --> <copyright value="[markdown]"/><!-- 0..1 Use and/or publishing restrictions --> <source[x]><!-- 0..1 uri|canonical(ValueSet) The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped --></source[x]> <target[x]><!-- 0..1 uri|canonical(ValueSet) The target value set which provides context for the mappings --></target[x]> <group> <!-- 0..* Same source and target systems --> <source value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Source system where concepts to be mapped are defined --> <sourceVersion value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Specific version of the code system --> <target value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Target system that the concepts are to be mapped to --> <targetVersion value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Specific version of the code system --> <element> <!-- 1..* Mappings for a concept from the source set --> <code value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 Identifies element being mapped --> <display value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Display for the code --> <target> <!-- 0..* Concept in target system for element --> <code value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 Code that identifies the target element --> <display value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Display for the code --> <equivalence value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 relatedto | equivalent | equal | wider | subsumes | narrower | specializes | inexact | unmatched | disjoint --> <comment value="[string]"/><!--0..1 Description of status/issues in mapping --> <dependsOn> <!-- 0..* Other elements required for this mapping (from context) --> <property value="[uri]"/><!-- 1..1 Reference to property mapping depends on --> <system><!-- 0..1 canonical(CodeSystem) Code System (if necessary) --></system> <value value="[string]"/><!-- 1..1 Value of the referenced element --> <display value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Display for the code (if value is a code) --> </dependsOn> <product><!-- 0..* Content as for ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn Other concepts that this mapping also produces --></product> </target> </element> <unmapped> <!-- 0..1 What to do when there is no mapping for the source concept --> <mode value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 provided | fixed | other-map --> <code value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 Fixed code when mode = fixed --> <display value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Display for the code --> <url><!-- 0..1 canonical(ConceptMap) canonical reference to an additional ConceptMap to use for mapping if the source concept is unmapped --></url> </unmapped> </group> </ConceptMap>
JSON Template
{
"resourceType" : "ConceptMap",
// from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language
// from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension
"url" : "<uri>", // Canonical identifier for this concept map, represented as a URI (globally unique)
"identifier" : { Identifier }, // Additional identifier for the concept map
"version" : "<string>", // Business version of the concept map
"
"name" : "<string>", // Name for this concept map (computer friendly)
"title" : "<string>", // Name for this concept map (human friendly)
"status" : "<code>", // R! draft | active | retired | unknown
"experimental" : <boolean>, // For testing purposes, not real usage
"date" : "<dateTime>", // Date last changed
"publisher" : "<string>", // Name of the publisher (organization or individual)
"contact" : [{ ContactDetail }], // Contact details for the publisher
"description" : "<markdown>", // Natural language description of the concept map
"useContext" : [{ UsageContext }], // The context that the content is intended to support
"jurisdiction" : [{ CodeableConcept }], // Intended jurisdiction for concept map (if applicable)
"purpose" : "<markdown>", // Why this concept map is defined
"copyright" : "<markdown>", // Use and/or publishing restrictions
// source[x]: The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped. One of these 2:
"sourceUri" : "<uri>",
"sourceCanonical" : { canonical(ValueSet) },
// target[x]: The target value set which provides context for the mappings. One of these 2:
"targetUri" : "<uri>",
"targetCanonical" : { canonical(ValueSet) },
"group" : [{ // Same source and target systems
"source" : "<uri>", // Source system where concepts to be mapped are defined
"sourceVersion" : "<string>", // Specific version of the code system
"target" : "<uri>", // Target system that the concepts are to be mapped to
"targetVersion" : "<string>", // Specific version of the code system
"element" : [{ // R! Mappings for a concept from the source set
"code" : "<code>", // Identifies element being mapped
"display" : "<string>", // Display for the code
"target" : [{ // Concept in target system for element
"code" : "<code>", // Code that identifies the target element
"display" : "<string>", // Display for the code
"equivalence" : "<code>", // R! relatedto | equivalent | equal | wider | subsumes | narrower | specializes | inexact | unmatched | disjoint
"comment" : "<string>", // C? Description of status/issues in mapping
"dependsOn" : [{ // Other elements required for this mapping (from context)
"property" : "<uri>", // R! Reference to property mapping depends on
"system" : { canonical(CodeSystem) }, // Code System (if necessary)
"value" : "<string>", // R! Value of the referenced element
"display" : "<string>" // Display for the code (if value is a code)
}],
"product" : [{ Content as for ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn }] // Other concepts that this mapping also produces
}]
}],
"unmapped" : { // What to do when there is no mapping for the source concept
"mode" : "<code>", // R! provided | fixed | other-map
"code" : "<code>", // Fixed code when mode = fixed
"display" : "<string>", // Display for the code
"url" : { canonical(ConceptMap) } // canonical reference to an additional ConceptMap to use for mapping if the source concept is unmapped
}
}]
}
Turtle Template
@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .[ a fhir:ConceptMap; fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot; # if this is the parser root # from Resource: .id, .meta, .implicitRules, and .language # from DomainResource: .text, .contained, .extension, and .modifierExtension fhir:ConceptMap.url [ uri ]; # 0..1 Canonical identifier for this concept map, represented as a URI (globally unique) fhir:ConceptMap.identifier [ Identifier ]; # 0..1 Additional identifier for the concept map fhir:ConceptMap.version [ string ]; # 0..1 Business version of the concept map fhir:ConceptMap.name [ string ]; # 0..1 Name for this concept map (computer friendly) fhir:ConceptMap.title [ string ]; # 0..1 Name for this concept map (human friendly) fhir:ConceptMap.status [ code ]; # 1..1 draft | active | retired | unknown fhir:ConceptMap.experimental [ boolean ]; # 0..1 For testing purposes, not real usage fhir:ConceptMap.date [ dateTime ]; # 0..1 Date last changed fhir:ConceptMap.publisher [ string ]; # 0..1 Name of the publisher (organization or individual) fhir:ConceptMap.contact [ ContactDetail ], ... ; # 0..* Contact details for the publisher fhir:ConceptMap.description [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Natural language description of the concept map fhir:ConceptMap.useContext [ UsageContext ], ... ; # 0..* The context that the content is intended to support fhir:ConceptMap.jurisdiction [ CodeableConcept ], ... ; # 0..* Intended jurisdiction for concept map (if applicable) fhir:ConceptMap.purpose [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Why this concept map is defined fhir:ConceptMap.copyright [ markdown ]; # 0..1 Use and/or publishing restrictions # ConceptMap.source[x] : 0..1 The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped. One of these 2 fhir:ConceptMap.sourceUri [ uri ] fhir:ConceptMap.sourceCanonical [ canonical(ValueSet) ] # ConceptMap.target[x] : 0..1 The target value set which provides context for the mappings. One of these 2 fhir:ConceptMap.targetUri [ uri ] fhir:ConceptMap.targetCanonical [ canonical(ValueSet) ] fhir:ConceptMap.group [ # 0..* Same source and target systems fhir:ConceptMap.group.source [ uri ]; # 0..1 Source system where concepts to be mapped are defined fhir:ConceptMap.group.sourceVersion [ string ]; # 0..1 Specific version of the code system fhir:ConceptMap.group.target [ uri ]; # 0..1 Target system that the concepts are to be mapped to fhir:ConceptMap.group.targetVersion [ string ]; # 0..1 Specific version of the code system fhir:ConceptMap.group.element [ # 1..* Mappings for a concept from the source set fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.code [ code ]; # 0..1 Identifies element being mapped fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.display [ string ]; # 0..1 Display for the code fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target [ # 0..* Concept in target system for element fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.code [ code ]; # 0..1 Code that identifies the target element fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.display [ string ]; # 0..1 Display for the code fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.equivalence [ code ]; # 1..1 relatedto | equivalent | equal | wider | subsumes | narrower | specializes | inexact | unmatched | disjoint fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.comment [ string ]; # 0..1 Description of status/issues in mapping fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn [ # 0..* Other elements required for this mapping (from context) fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn.property [ uri ]; # 1..1 Reference to property mapping depends on fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn.system [ canonical(CodeSystem) ]; # 0..1 Code System (if necessary) fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn.value [ string ]; # 1..1 Value of the referenced element fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn.display [ string ]; # 0..1 Display for the code (if value is a code) ], ...; fhir:ConceptMap.group.element.target.product [ See ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn ], ... ; # 0..* Other concepts that this mapping also produces ], ...; ], ...; fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped [ # 0..1 What to do when there is no mapping for the source concept fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped.mode [ code ]; # 1..1 provided | fixed | other-map fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped.code [ code ]; # 0..1 Fixed code when mode = fixed fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped.display [ string ]; # 0..1 Display for the code fhir:ConceptMap.group.unmapped.url [ canonical(ConceptMap) ]; # 0..1 canonical reference to an additional ConceptMap to use for mapping if the source concept is unmapped ]; ], ...; ]
Changes
since
Release
3
4
| ConceptMap |
|
See the Full Difference for further information
This analysis is available as XML or JSON .
Conversions between R3 and R4
See R3 <--> R4 Conversion Maps (status = 4 tests that all execute ok. All tests pass round-trip testing and 4 r3 resources are invalid (0 errors). )
See the Profiles & Extensions and the alternate definitions: Master Definition XML + JSON , XML Schema / Schematron + JSON Schema , ShEx (for Turtle ) + see the extensions & the dependency analysis
| Path | Definition | Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ConceptMap.status |
|
Required | PublicationStatus |
| ConceptMap.jurisdiction |
|
Extensible | Jurisdiction ValueSet |
| ConceptMap.group.element.target.equivalence |
|
Required | ConceptMapEquivalence |
| ConceptMap.group.unmapped.mode |
|
Required | ConceptMapGroupUnmappedMode |
| id | Level | Location | Description | Expression |
| cmd-0 | Warning | (base) | Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation | name.exists() implies name.matches('[A-Z]([A-Za-z0-9_]){0,254}') |
| cmd-1 | Rule | ConceptMap.group.element.target | If the map is narrower or inexact, there SHALL be some comments | comment.exists() or equivalence.empty() or ((equivalence != 'narrower') and (equivalence != 'inexact')) |
| cmd-2 | Rule | ConceptMap.group.unmapped | If the mode is 'fixed', a code must be provided | (mode = 'fixed') implies code.exists() |
| cmd-3 | Rule | ConceptMap.group.unmapped | If the mode is 'other-map', a url must be provided | (mode = 'other-map') implies url.exists() |
system
,
version
and
code
elements
are
the
same
as
used
by
the
Coding
data
type
element
for
each
source
concept.
if
there
is
more
than
one,
then
just
as
one
element
can
have
multiple
targets,
multiple
occurrences
of
element
with
the
same
element.code
simply
aggregate
their
target
elements
as
if
there
was
only
one
element
The
concept
mappings
in
element
are
arranged
into
groups
that
share
common
source/target
systems.
These
groups
have
no
semantic
significance;
they
exist
to
make
the
representation
more
concise.
Concept
maps
may
contain
more
than
one
group
with
the
same
source
and
target
-
this
would
be
a
less
concise
representation
but
may
be
useful
in
order
to
maintain
a
fixed
order
for
the
concepts
that
are
mapped.
Concepts
that
are
labeled
as
'unmatched'
are
considered
to
be
unmatched
in
the
target
value
set,
irrespective
of
whether
they
are
contained
in
a
group
with
a
stated
target
system
or
not.
Groups
that
contain
no
target
system
may
only
contained
'unmatched'
concepts.
There
is
no
difference
in
the
meaning
of
an
unmatched
target
whether
or
not
there
is
a
stated
target
system.
In the simple case, a mapping is made from one code to another. E.g. from "home address" in one code system to "address - home" in another. But in other cases, the mapping is not a simple one to one mapping. A typical example might be mapping between a radiology imaging request that has 2 elements: modality, and body site, and another radiology imaging request that pre-coordinates both of these into a single code modality+body site. In this case, it is not possible to map from one code to another. Instead, the mapping might contain entries like this:
| Source Concept | DependsOn.property | DependsOn Concept | Target Concept |
| X-Ray | Bodysite | Chest | Chest-XRay |
When
attempting
to
translate
the
source
to
the
target,
an
application
must
also
provide
a
value
for
the
element
identified
in
dependsOn.property
so
that
the
correct
mapping
can
be
performed.
To
support
the
reverse
operation,
product
is
the
converse,
and
works
in
reverse.
To see a real example of a mapping with dependencies, check the Specimen Type Mapping .
If
there
is
no
explicit
mapping
for
a
code
-
that
is,
the
engine
processing
the
ConceptMap
finds
a
group
with
a
matching
source
system,
but
not
matching
element
for
the
code
it
is
translating,
processing
proceeds
to
the
unmapped
element
that
specifies
what
should
happen.
The unmapped element can specify one of the following different actions to take if there is no mapping for a concept:
| provided | Use the code source as provided in the $translate request. This is especially useful for translations between versions of the same code system, where only a few codes have changed |
| fixed |
Use
the
code
(and
display)
explicitly
provided
in
the
group.unmapped
.
This
is
useful
when
there's
a
fall
back
general
code
-
especially
for
classifications
|
| other-map |
Use
the
map
identified
by
the
canonical
URL
in
url
.
This
is
useful
when
a
published
concept
map
needs
to
be
varied
for
a
few
specific
cases
on
an
institutional
bass
-
the
institution
can
create
a
simple
concept
that
expresses
their
special
cases,
and
then
refer
to
the
general
purpose
mappings
|
Note that this element is not used when there is an element with a matching code value, and an equivalence value of unmatched (or disjoint).
The ConceptMap resource is intended to map between concepts defined in a code system. It can also be useful to use the ConceptMap resource to define relationships between concepts defined in other kinds of resources. Here are some common kind of conceptual maps:
Though
these
resources
are
not
explicitly
defining
code
systems,
they
do
define
'concept's
that
can
still
usefully
be
treated
as
code
systems
for
the
sake
of
subsetting
(e.g.
ValueSet
)
and
defining
relationships
(e.g.
ConceptMap
).
See
Implicit
Code
Systems
for
further
information.
Note that this is different from StructureMap because that is intended to define an executional transform between structures, not a conceptual model.
Search parameters for this resource. The common parameters also apply. See Searching for more information about searching in REST, messaging, and services.
| Name | Type | Description | Expression | In Common |
| context | token | A use context assigned to the concept map | (ConceptMap.useContext.value as CodeableConcept) | |
| context-quantity | quantity | A quantity- or range-valued use context assigned to the concept map | (ConceptMap.useContext.value as Quantity) | (ConceptMap.useContext.value as Range) | |
| context-type | token | A type of use context assigned to the concept map | ConceptMap.useContext.code | |
| context-type-quantity | composite | A use context type and quantity- or range-based value assigned to the concept map |
On
ConceptMap.useContext:
context-type: code context-quantity: value.as(Quantity) | value.as(Range) |
|
| context-type-value | composite | A use context type and value assigned to the concept map |
On
ConceptMap.useContext:
context-type: code context: value.as(CodeableConcept) |
|
| date | date | The concept map publication date | ConceptMap.date | |
| dependson | uri | Reference to property mapping depends on | ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn.property | |
| description | string | The description of the concept map | ConceptMap.description | |
| identifier | token | External identifier for the concept map | ConceptMap.identifier | |
| jurisdiction | token | Intended jurisdiction for the concept map | ConceptMap.jurisdiction | |
| name | string | Computationally friendly name of the concept map | ConceptMap.name | |
| other | reference | canonical reference to an additional ConceptMap to use for mapping if the source concept is unmapped |
ConceptMap.group.unmapped.url
( ConceptMap ) |
|
| product | uri | Reference to property mapping depends on | ConceptMap.group.element.target.product.property | |
| publisher | string | Name of the publisher of the concept map | ConceptMap.publisher | |
| source | reference | The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped |
(ConceptMap.source
as
canonical)
( ValueSet ) |
|
| source-code | token | Identifies element being mapped | ConceptMap.group.element.code | |
| source-system | uri | Source system where concepts to be mapped are defined | ConceptMap.group.source | |
| source-uri | reference | The source value set that contains the concepts that are being mapped |
(ConceptMap.source
as
uri)
( ValueSet ) |
|
| status | token | The current status of the concept map | ConceptMap.status | |
| target | reference | The target value set which provides context for the mappings |
(ConceptMap.target
as
canonical)
( ValueSet ) |
|
| target-code | token | Code that identifies the target element | ConceptMap.group.element.target.code | |
| target-system | uri | Target system that the concepts are to be mapped to | ConceptMap.group.target | |
| target-uri | reference | The target value set which provides context for the mappings |
(ConceptMap.target
as
uri)
( ValueSet ) |
|
| title | string | The human-friendly name of the concept map | ConceptMap.title | |
| url | uri | The uri that identifies the concept map | ConceptMap.url | |
| version | token | The business version of the concept map | ConceptMap.version |