This
page
is
part
of
the
FHIR
Specification
(v4.0.1:
R4
(v4.3.0:
R4B
-
Mixed
Normative
and
STU
)
in
it's
permanent
home
(it
will
always
be
available
at
this
URL).
).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R5
R4B
R4
R4B
R4
R3
| Vocabulary Work Group | Maturity Level : N/A | Standards Status : Informative |
Raw XML ( canonical form + also see XML Format Specification )
v2.ContactPointSystem
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <ConceptMap xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <id value="cm-contact-point-system-v2"/> <text><status value="extensions"/> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <h2> v2.ContactPointSystem (http://hl7.org/fhir/ConceptMap/cm-contact-point-system-v2)</h2> <p> Mapping from <a href="valueset-contact-point-system.html">http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/contact-point-system</a> to<a href="http://terminology.hl7.org/3.1.0/ValueSet-v2-0202.html">http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0202</a> </p>DRAFT. Published on 01/11/2019 9:29:23 AM by HL7 (FHIR Project) (<p> DRAFT. Published on 2022-05-28T12:47:40+10:00 by HL7 (FHIR Project) ( <a href="http://hl7.org/fhir">http://hl7.org/fhir</a> , <a href="mailto:fhir@lists.hl7.org">fhir@lists.hl7.org</a> ). </p> <br/> <table class="grid"> <tr> <td> <b> Source Code</b> </td> <td><b> Relationship</b> </td> <td> <b> Destination Code</b> </td> <td> <b> Comment</b> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4">Mapping from <a href="codesystem-contact-point-system.html">ContactPointSystem</a> to <a href="http://terminology.hl7.org/3.1.0/CodeSystem-v2-0202.html">telecommunicationEquipmentType</a> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> phone</td><td> <a href="codesystem-concept-map-equivalence.html#equivalent">is equivalent to</a> </td> <td> PH (Telephone)</td> <td/> </tr> <tr> <td> fax</td><td> <a href="codesystem-concept-map-equivalence.html#equivalent">is equivalent to</a> </td> <td> FX (Fax)</td> <td/> </tr> <tr> <td> email</td><td> <a href="codesystem-concept-map-equivalence.html#source-is-narrower-than-target">is narrower then</a> </td> <td> Internet (Internet Address)</td> <td> for email addresses</td> </tr> <tr> <td> pager</td><td> <a href="codesystem-concept-map-equivalence.html#equivalent">is equivalent to</a> </td> <td> BP (Beeper)</td> <td/> </tr> <tr> <td> url</td><td> <a href="codesystem-concept-map-equivalence.html#source-is-narrower-than-target">is narrower then</a> </td> <td> Internet (Internet Address)</td> <td> for non-email kinds of addresses</td> </tr> </table> </div> </text> <url value="http://hl7.org/fhir/ConceptMap/cm-contact-point-system-v2"/><version value="4.3.0"/> <name value="v2.ContactPointSystem"/> <title value="v2 map for ContactPointSystem"/> <status value="draft"/><experimental value="false"/> <date value="2022-05-28T12:47:40+10:00"/> <publisher value="HL7 (FHIR Project)"/> <contact> <telecom> <system value="url"/> <value value="http://hl7.org/fhir"/> </telecom> <telecom> <system value="email"/> <value value="fhir@lists.hl7.org"/> </telecom> </contact> <sourceCanonical value="http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/contact-point-system"/> <targetCanonical value="http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0202"/> <group> <source value="http://hl7.org/fhir/contact-point-system"/> <target value="http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0202"/> <element> <code value="phone"/> <target> <code value="PH"/> <equivalence value="equivalent"/> </target> </element> <element> <code value="fax"/> <target> <code value="FX"/> <equivalence value="equivalent"/> </target> </element> <element> <code value="email"/> <target> <code value="Internet"/><equivalence value="wider"/> <comment value="for email addresses"/> </target> </element> <element> <code value="pager"/> <target> <code value="BP"/> <equivalence value="equivalent"/> </target> </element> <element> <code value="url"/> <target> <code value="Internet"/><equivalence value="wider"/> <comment value="for non-email kinds of addresses"/> </target> </element> </group> </ ConceptMap >
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.