FHIR Release 3 (STU) 4

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.0.2: (v4.0.1: R4 - Mixed Normative and STU 3). ) in it's permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0 . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R4 R3 R2

Condition-example-f203-sepsis

Patient Care Work Group Maturity Level : N/A Ballot Standards Status : Informative Compartments : Encounter , Patient , Practitioner , RelatedPerson

This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML or , JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile Condition .

Generated Narrative with Details

id : f203

clinicalStatus : active Active (Details : {http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-clinical code 'active' = 'Active)

verificationStatus : confirmed Confirmed (Details : {http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-ver-status code 'confirmed' = 'Confirmed)

category : Problem (Details : {SNOMED CT code '55607006' = 'Problem', given as 'Problem'}; {http://hl7.org/fhir/condition-category {http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-category code 'problem-list-item' = 'Problem List Item)

severity : Moderate to severe (Details : {SNOMED CT code '371924009' = 'Moderate to severe', given as 'Moderate to severe'})

code : Bacterial sepsis (Details : {SNOMED CT code '10001005' = 'Bacterial septicemia', given as 'Bacterial sepsis'})

bodySite : Pulmonary vascular structure (Details : {SNOMED CT code '281158006' = 'Pulmonary vascular structure', given as 'Pulmonary vascular structure'})

subject : Roel

context encounter : Roel's encounter on March eleventh elevanth

onset : 08/03/2013

assertedDate recordedDate : 11/03/2013

asserter : Practitioner/f201

Evidences

- Detail
* Diagnostic report for Roel's sepsis

 

Other examples that reference this example:

  • CarePlan/Sepsis treatment
  • MedicationDispense/IV Antibiotic

    •  

    Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.