Level
Lvl
|
Code
|
Display
|
Definition
|
|
1
|
ART
|
act
relationship
type
|
Description:
A
directed
association
between
a
source
Act
and
a
target
Act.
Usage
Note:
This
code
should
never
be
transmitted
in
an
instance
as
the
value
of
ActRelationship.typeCode
(attribute)
|
|
2
|
(_ActClassTemporallyPertains)
_ActClassTemporallyPertains
|
ActClassTemporallyPertains
|
ActClassTemporallyPertains
|
|
2
|
(_ActRelationshipAccounting)
_ActRelationshipAccounting
|
ActRelationshipAccounting
|
Codes
that
describe
the
relationship
between
an
Act
and
a
financial
instrument
such
as
a
financial
transaction,
account
or
invoice
element.
|
|
3
|
(_ActRelationshipCostTracking)
_ActRelationshipCostTracking
|
ActRelationshipCostTracking
|
Expresses
values
for
describing
the
relationship
relationship
between
an
InvoiceElement
or
InvoiceElementGroup
and
a
billable
act.
|
|
4
|
CHRG
CHRG
|
has
charge
|
A
relationship
that
provides
an
ability
to
associate
a
financial
transaction
(target)
as
a
charge
to
a
clinical
act
(source).
A
clinical
act
may
have
a
charge
associated
with
the
execution
or
delivery
of
the
service.
The
financial
transaction
will
define
the
charge
(bill)
for
delivery
or
performance
of
the
service.
Charges
and
costs
are
distinct
terms.
A
charge
defines
what
is
charged
or
billed
to
another
organization
or
entity
within
an
organization.
The
cost
defines
what
it
costs
an
organization
to
perform
or
deliver
a
service
or
product.
|
|
4
|
COST
COST
|
has
cost
|
A
relationship
that
provides
an
ability
to
associate
a
financial
transaction
(target)
as
a
cost
to
a
clinical
act
(source).
A
clinical
act
may
have
an
inherit
cost
associated
with
the
execution
or
delivery
of
the
service.
The
financial
transaction
will
define
the
cost
of
delivery
or
performance
of
the
service.
Charges
and
costs
are
distinct
terms.
A
charge
defines
what
is
charged
or
billed
to
another
organization
or
entity
within
an
organization.
The
cost
defines
what
it
costs
an
organization
to
perform
or
deliver
a
service
or
product.
|
|
3
|
(_ActRelationshipPosting)
_ActRelationshipPosting
|
ActRelationshipPosting
|
Expresses
values
for
describing
the
relationship
between
a
FinancialTransaction
and
an
Account.
|
|
4
|
CREDIT
CREDIT
|
has
credit
|
A
credit
relationship
ties
a
financial
transaction
(target)
to
an
account
(source).
A
credit,
once
applied
(posted),
may
have
either
a
positive
or
negative
effect
on
the
account
balance,
depending
on
the
type
of
account.
An
asset
account
credit
will
decrease
the
account
balance.
A
non-asset
account
credit
will
decrease
the
account
balance.
|
|
4
|
DEBIT
DEBIT
|
has
debit
|
A
debit
relationship
ties
a
financial
transaction
(target)
to
an
account
(source).
A
debit,
once
applied
(posted),
may
have
either
a
positive
or
negative
effect
on
the
account
balance,
depending
on
the
type
of
account.
An
asset
account
debit
will
increase
the
account
balance.
A
non-asset
account
debit
will
decrease
the
account
balance.
|
|
2
|
(_ActRelationshipConditional)
_ActRelationshipConditional
|
ActRelationshipConditional
|
Specifies
under
what
circumstances
(target
Act)
the
source-Act
may,
must,
must
not
or
has
occurred
|
|
3
|
CIND
CIND
|
has
contra-indication
|
A
contraindication
is
just
a
negation
of
a
reason,
i.e.
it
gives
a
condition
under
which
the
action
is
not
to
be
done.
Both,
source
and
target
can
be
any
kind
of
service;
target
service
is
in
criterion
mood.
How
the
strength
of
a
contraindication
is
expressed
(e.g.,
(e.g.
relative,
absolute)
is
left
as
an
open
issue.
The
priorityNumber
attribute
could
be
used.
|
|
3
|
PRCN
PRCN
|
has
pre-condition
|
A
requirement
to
be
true
before
a
service
is
performed.
The
target
can
be
any
service
in
criterion
mood.
For
multiple
pre-conditions
a
conjunction
attribute
(AND,
OR,
XOR)
is
applicable.
|
|
3
|
RSON
RSON
|
has
reason
|
Description:
The
reason
or
rationale
for
a
service.
A
reason
link
is
weaker
than
a
trigger,
it
only
suggests
that
some
service
may
be
or
might
have
been
a
reason
for
some
action,
but
not
that
this
reason
requires/required
the
action
to
be
taken.
Also,
as
opposed
to
the
trigger,
there
is
no
strong
timely
relation
between
the
reason
and
the
action.
As
well
as
providing
various
types
of
information
about
the
rationale
for
a
service,
the
RSON
act
relationship
is
routinely
used
between
a
SBADM
act
and
an
OBS
act
to
describe
the
indication
for
use
of
a
medication.
Child
concepts
may
be
used
to
describe
types
of
indication.
Discussion:
In
prior
releases,
the
code
"SUGG"
(suggests)
was
expressed
as
"an
inversion
of
the
reason
link."
That
code
has
been
retired
in
favor
of
the
inversion
indicator
that
is
an
attribute
of
ActRelationship.
|
|
4
|
BLOCK
BLOCK
|
blocks
|
Definition:
The
source
act
is
performed
to
block
the
effects
of
the
target
act.
This
act
relationship
should
be
used
when
describing
near
miss
type
incidents
where
potential
harm
could
have
occurred,
but
the
action
described
in
the
source
act
blocked
the
potential
harmful
effects
of
the
incident
actually
occurring.
|
|
4
|
DIAG
DIAG
|
diagnoses
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intended
to
help
establish
the
presence
of
a
(an
adverse)
situation
described
by
the
target
act.
This
is
not
limited
to
diseases
but
can
apply
to
any
adverse
situation
or
condition
of
medical
or
technical
nature.
|
|
4
|
IMM
IMM
|
immunization
against
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intented
to
provide
immunity
against
the
effects
of
the
target
act
(the
target
act
describes
an
infectious
disease)
|
|
5
|
ACTIMM
ACTIMM
|
active
immunization
against
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intended
to
provide
active
immunity
against
the
effects
of
the
target
act
(the
target
act
describes
an
infectious
disease)
|
|
5
|
PASSIMM
PASSIMM
|
passive
immunization
against
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intended
to
provide
passive
immunity
against
the
effects
of
the
target
act
(the
target
act
describes
an
infectious
disease).
|
|
4
|
MITGT
MITGT
|
mitigates
|
The
source
act
removes
or
lessens
the
occurrence
or
effect
of
the
target
act.
|
|
5
|
RCVY
RCVY
|
recovers
|
Definition:
The
source
act
is
performed
to
recover
from
the
effects
of
the
target
act.
|
|
4
|
PRYLX
PRYLX
|
prophylaxis
of
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intended
to
reduce
the
risk
of
of
an
adverse
situation
to
emerge
as
described
by
the
target
act.
This
is
not
limited
to
diseases
but
can
apply
to
any
adverse
situation
or
condition
of
medical
or
technical
nature.
|
|
4
|
TREAT
TREAT
|
treats
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intended
to
improve
a
pre-existing
adverse
situation
described
by
the
target
act.
This
is
not
limited
to
diseases
but
can
apply
to
any
adverse
situation
or
condition
of
medical
or
technical
nature.
|
|
5
|
ADJUNCT
ADJUNCT
|
adjunctive
treatment
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intended
to
offer
an
additional
treatment
for
the
management
or
cure
of
a
pre-existing
adverse
situation
described
by
the
target
act.
This
is
not
limited
to
diseases
but
can
apply
to
any
adverse
situation
or
condition
of
medical
or
technical
nature.
It
is
not
a
requirement
that
the
non-adjunctive
treatment
is
explicitly
specified.
|
|
5
|
MTREAT
MTREAT
|
maintenance
treatment
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intended
to
provide
long
term
maintenance
improvement
or
management
of
a
pre-existing
adverse
situation
described
by
the
target
act.
This
is
not
limited
to
diseases
but
can
apply
to
any
adverse
situation
or
condition
of
medical
or
technical
nature.
|
|
5
|
PALLTREAT
PALLTREAT
|
palliates
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intended
to
provide
palliation
for
the
effects
of
the
target
act.
|
|
5
|
SYMP
SYMP
|
symptomatic
relief
|
Description:
The
source
act
is
intented
to
provide
symptomatic
relief
for
the
effects
of
the
target
act.
|
|
3
|
TRIG
TRIG
|
has
trigger
|
A
pre-condition
that
if
true
should
result
in
the
source
Act
being
executed.
The
target
is
in
typically
in
criterion
mood.
When
reported
after
the
fact
(i.e.
the
criterion
has
been
met)
it
may
be
in
Event
mood.
A
delay
between
the
trigger
and
the
triggered
action
can
be
specified.
Discussion:
This
includes
the
concept
of
a
required
act
for
a
service
or
financial
instrument
such
as
an
insurance
plan
or
policy.
In
such
cases,
the
trigger
is
the
occurrence
of
a
specific
condition
such
as
coverage
limits
being
exceeded.
|
|
2
|
(_ActRelationshipTemporallyPertains)
_ActRelationshipTemporallyPertains
|
ActRelationshipTemporallyPertains
|
Abstract
collector
for
ActRelationhsip
types
that
relate
two
acts
by
their
timing.
|
|
3
|
(_ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsApproximates)
_ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsApproximates
|
ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsApproximates
|
Abstract
collector
for
ActRelationship
types
that
relate
two
acts
by
their
approximate
timing.
|
|
4
|
ENE
ENE
|
ends
near
end
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
ends
near
the
end
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Near
is
defined
separately
as
a
time
interval.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
ENS
|
|
5
|
ECW
ECW
|
ends
concurrent
with
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
ends
with
the
end
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
UsageNote:
This
code
is
reflexive.
Therefore
its
inverse
code
is
itself.
|
|
6
|
CONCURRENT
CONCURRENT
|
concurrent
with
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
is
the
same
as
the
target
act's
effective
time.
UsageNote:
This
code
is
reflexive.
Therefore
its
inverse
code
is
itself.
|
|
6
|
SBSECWE
SBSECWE
|
starts
before
start
of,
ends
with
|
The
source
Act
starts
before
the
start
of
the
target
Act,
and
ends
with
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SASECWE
|
|
4
|
ENS
ENS
|
ends
near
start
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
ends
near
the
start
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Near
is
defined
separately
as
a
time
interval.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
ENE
|
|
5
|
ECWS
ECWS
|
ends
concurrent
with
start
of
|
The
source
Act
ends
when
the
target
act
starts
(i.e.
if
we
say
"ActOne
ECWS
ActTwo",
it
means
that
ActOne
ends
when
ActTwo
starts,
therefore
ActOne
is
the
source
and
ActTwo
is
the
target).
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SCWE
|
|
4
|
SNE
SNE
|
starts
near
end
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
starts
near
the
end
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Near
is
defined
separately
as
a
time
interval.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
SNS
|
|
5
|
SCWE
SCWE
|
starts
concurrent
with
end
of
|
The
source
Act
starts
when
the
target
act
ends
(i.e.
if
we
say
"ActOne
SCWE
ActTwo",
it
means
that
ActOne
starts
when
ActTwo
ends,
therefore
ActOne
is
the
source
and
ActTwo
is
the
target).
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SBSECWS
|
|
4
|
SNS
SNS
|
starts
near
start
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
starts
near
the
start
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Near
is
defined
separately
as
a
time
interval.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
SNE
|
|
5
|
SCW
SCW
|
starts
concurrent
with
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
starts
with
the
start
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
UsageNote:
This
code
is
reflexive.
Therefore
its
inverse
code
is
itself.
|
6
CONCURRENT
|
6
|
SCWSEBE
SCWSEBE
|
starts
with.
ends
before
end
of
|
The
source
Act
starts
with.the
target
Act
and
ends
before
the
end
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SCWSEAE
|
|
6
|
SCWSEAE
SCWSEAE
|
starts
with,
ends
after
end
of
|
The
source
Act
starts
with
the
Target
target
Act,
abd==nd
and
ends
after
the
end
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SCWSEBE
|
|
3
|
EAS
EAS
|
ends
after
start
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act
ends
after
the
target
act
starts.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SBE
|
|
4
|
EAE
EAE
|
ends
after
end
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act
ends
after
the
target
act
ends.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
EBE
|
|
5
|
SASEAE
SASEAE
|
starts
after
start
of,
ends
after
end
of
|
The
source
Act
starts
after
start
of
the
target
Act
and
ends
after
end
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SBSEBE
|
|
6
|
SBEEAE
SBEEAE
|
contains
end
of
|
The
source
Act
contains
the
end
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
EDU
|
|
7
|
SASSBEEAS
SASSBEEAS
|
start
after
start
of,
contains
end
of
|
The
source
Act
start
after
the
start
of
the
target
Act,
and
contains
the
end
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SBSEASEBE
|
|
7
|
SBSEAE
SBSEAE
|
contains
time
of
|
The
source
Act
contains
the
time
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
DURING
|
7
SCWSEAE
6
SASSBEEAS
|
4
|
SAS
SAS
|
starts
after
start
of
|
The
source
Act
starts
after
the
start
of
the
target
Act
(i.e.
if
we
say
"ActOne
SAS
ActTwo",
it
means
that
ActOne
starts
after
the
start
of
ActTwo,
therefore
ActOne
is
the
source
and
ActTwo
is
the
target).
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SBS
|
5
SASEAE
|
5
|
SAE
SAE
|
starts
after
end
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act
starts
after
the
target
act
ends.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
EBS
|
|
5
|
DURING
DURING
|
occurs
during
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
is
wholly
within
the
target
act's
effective
time
(including
end
points,
end-points,
as
defined
in
the
act's
effective
times)
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SBSEAE
|
|
5
|
SASECWE
SASECWE
|
starts
after
start
of,
ends
with
|
The
source
Act
starts
after
start
of
the
target
Act,
and
ends
with
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SBSECWE
|
|
3
|
EASORECWS
EASORECWS
|
ends
after
or
concurrent
with
start
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
ends
after
or
concurrent
with
the
start
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
EBSORECWS
|
4
EAS
|
4
|
EAEORECW
EAEORECW
|
ends
after
or
concurrent
with
end
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
ends
after
or
concurrent
with
the
end
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
EBEORECW
|
5
EAE
5
ECW
4
ECWS
|
3
|
INDEPENDENT
INDEPENDENT
|
independent
of
time
of
|
The
source
Act
is
independent
of
the
time
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
This
code
is
reflexive.
Therefore
its
inverse
code
is
itself.
|
|
3
|
SAEORSCWE
SAEORSCWE
|
starts
after
or
concurrent
with
end
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
starts
after
or
concurrent
with
the
end
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
SBEORSCWE
4
SCWE
|
4
SAE
|
3
|
SASORSCW
SASORSCW
|
starts
after
or
concurrent
with
start
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
starts
after
or
concurrent
with
the
start
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
SBSORSCW
|
4
SAS
4
SCW
|
3
|
SBEORSCWE
SBEORSCWE
|
starts
before
or
concurrent
with
end
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
starts
before
or
concurrent
with
the
end
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
SAEORSCWE
|
|
4
|
OVERLAP
OVERLAP
|
overlaps
with
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
overlaps
the
target
act's
effective
time
in
any
way.
UsageNote:
This
code
is
reflexive.
Therefore
its
inverse
code
is
itself.
|
5
ECW
|
5
|
EDU
EDU
|
ends
during
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act
ends
within
the
target
act's
effective
time
(including
end
points,
end-points,
as
defined
in
the
act's
effective
times)
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SBEEAE
|
|
6
|
SBSEASEBE
SBSEASEBE
|
contains
start
of,
ends
before
end
of
|
The
source
Act
contains
the
start
of
the
target
Act,
and
ends
before
the
end
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SASSBEEAS
6
|
SCWSEBE
5
SBEEAE
|
5
|
SBSEAS
SBSEAS
|
contains
start
of
|
The
source
Act
contains
the
start
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SDU
|
6
SBSECWE
6
SBSEASEBE
6
SBSEAE
5
SCW
5
SCWE
|
5
|
SDU
SDU
|
starts
during
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act
starts
within
the
target
act's
effective
time
(including
end
points,
end-points,
as
defined
in
the
act's
effective
times)
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SBSEAS
|
6
SASSBEEAS
|
4
|
SBE
SBE
|
starts
before
end
of
|
The
source
Act
starts
before
the
end
of
the
target
Act
(i.e.
if
we
say
"ActOne
SBE
ActTwo",
it
means
that
ActOne
starts
before
the
end
of
ActTwo,
therefore
ActOne
is
the
source
and
ActTwo
is
the
target).
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
EAS
|
|
5
|
EBE
EBE
|
ends
before
end
of
|
The
source
Act
ends
before
the
end
of
the
target
Act
(i.e.
if
we
say
"ActOne
EBE
ActTwo",
it
means
that
ActOne
ends
before
the
end
of
ActTwo,
therefore
ActOne
is
the
source
and
ActTwo
is
the
target).
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
EAE
|
|
6
|
SBSEBE
SBSEBE
|
starts
before
start
of,
ends
before
end
of
|
The
source
Act
starts
before
the
start
of
the
target
Act,
and
ends
before
the
end
of
the
target
Act.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SASEAE
|
7
SBSEASEBE
|
7
|
EBSORECWS
EBSORECWS
|
ends
before
or
concurrent
with
start
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
ends
before
or
concurrent
with
the
start
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
EASORECWS
|
8
ECWS
|
8
|
EBS
EBS
|
ends
before
start
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act
ends
before
the
target
act
starts.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SAE
5
SBSEASEBE
|
5
SCWSEBE
|
5
|
EBEORECW
EBEORECW
|
ends
before
or
concurrent
with
end
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
ends
before
or
concurrent
with
the
end
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
EAEORECW
6
ECW
|
6
EBE
|
5
|
SBSORSCW
SBSORSCW
|
starts
before
or
concurrent
with
start
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act's
effective
time
starts
before
or
concurrent
with
the
start
of
the
target
act's
effective
time.
Usage
Note:
Inverse
code
is
SASORSCW
|
6
SCW
|
6
|
SBS
SBS
|
starts
before
start
of
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act
begins
before
the
target
act
begins.
UsageNote:
Inverse
code
is
SAS
|
7
SBSEBE
7
SBSEAS
|
2
|
AUTH
AUTH
|
authorized
by
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
target
act
authorizes
or
certifies
the
source
act.
|
|
2
|
CAUS
CAUS
|
is
etiology
for
|
Description:
An
assertion
that
an
act
was
the
cause
of
another
act.This
is
stronger
and
more
specific
than
the
support
link.
The
source
(cause)
is
typically
an
observation,
but
may
be
any
act,
while
the
target
may
be
any
act.
Examples:
a
growth
of
Staphylococcus
aureus
may
be
considered
the
cause
of
an
abscess
contamination
of
the
infusion
bag
was
deemed
to
be
the
cause
of
the
infection
that
the
patient
experienced
lack
of
staff
on
the
shift
was
deemed
to
be
a
supporting
factor
(proximal
factor)
causing
the
patient
safety
incident
where
the
patient
fell
out
of
bed
because
the
bed-sides
had
not
been
put
up
which
caused
the
night
patient
to
fall
out
of
bed
|
|
2
|
COMP
COMP
|
has
component
|
The
target
act
is
a
component
of
the
source
act,
with
no
semantics
regarding
composition
or
aggregation
implied.
|
|
3
|
CTRLV
CTRLV
|
has
control
variable
|
A
relationship
from
an
Act
to
a
Control
Variable.
For
example,
if
a
Device
makes
an
Observation,
this
relates
the
Observation
to
its
Control
Variables
documenting
the
device's
settings
that
influenced
the
observation.
|
|
3
|
MBR
MBR
|
has
member
|
The
target
Acts
are
aggregated
by
the
source
Act.
Target
Acts
may
have
independent
existence,
participate
in
multiple
ActRelationships,
and
do
not
contribute
to
the
meaning
of
the
source.
UsageNotes:
This
explicitly
represents
the
conventional
notion
of
aggregation.
The
target
Act
is
part
of
a
collection
of
Acts
(no
implication
is
made
of
cardinality,
a
source
of
Acts
may
contain
zero,
one,
or
more
member
target
Acts).
It
is
expected
that
this
will
be
primarily
used
with
_ActClassRecordOrganizer,
BATTERY,
and
LIST
|
|
4
|
STEP
STEP
|
has
step
|
A
collection
of
sub-services
as
steps
or
subtasks
performed
for
the
source
service.
Services
may
be
performed
sequentially
or
concurrently.
UsageNotes:
Sequence
of
steps
may
be
indicated
by
use
of
_ActRelationshipTemporallyPertains,
as
well
as
via
ActRelationship.sequenceNumber,
ActRelationship.pauseQuantity,
Target.priorityCode.
OpenIssue:
Need
Additional
guidelines
on
when
each
approach
should
be
used.
|
|
5
|
ARR
ARR
|
arrival
|
The
relationship
that
links
to
a
Transportation
Act
(target)
from
another
Act
(source)
indicating
that
the
subject
of
the
source
Act
entered
into
the
source
Act
by
means
of
the
target
Transportation
act.
|
|
5
|
DEP
DEP
|
departure
|
The
relationship
that
links
to
a
Transportation
Act
(target)
from
another
Act
(source)
indicating
that
the
subject
of
the
source
Act
departed
from
the
source
Act
by
means
of
the
target
Transportation
act.
|
|
3
|
PART
PART
|
has
part
|
The
source
Act
is
a
composite
of
the
target
Acts.
The
target
Acts
do
not
have
an
existence
independent
of
the
source
Act.
UsageNote:
In
UML
1.1,
this
is
a
"composition"
defined
as:
"A
form
of
aggregation
with
strong
ownership
and
coincident
lifetime
as
part
of
the
whole.
Parts
with
non-fixed
multiplicity
may
be
created
after
the
composite
itself,
but
once
created
they
live
and
die
with
it
(i.e.,
they
share
lifetimes).
Such
parts
can
also
be
explicitly
removed
before
the
death
of
the
composite.
Composition
may
be
recursive."
|
|
2
|
COVBY
COVBY
|
covered
by
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
source
act
is
covered
by
or
is
under
the
authority
of
a
target
act.
A
financial
instrument
such
as
an
Invoice
Element
is
covered
by
one
or
more
specific
instances
of
an
Insurance
Policy.
|
|
2
|
DRIV
DRIV
|
is
derived
from
|
Associates
a
derived
Act
with
its
input
parameters.
E.G.,
parameters;
e.g.
an
anion-gap
observation
can
be
associated
as
being
derived
from
given
sodium-,
(potassium-,),
chloride-,
and
bicarbonate-observations.
The
narrative
content
(Act.text)
of
a
source
act
is
wholly
machine-derived
from
the
collection
of
target
acts.
|
|
2
|
ELNK
ELNK
|
episodeLink
|
Expresses
an
association
that
links
two
instances
of
the
same
act
over
time,
indicating
that
the
instance
are
part
of
the
same
episode,
e.g.
linking
two
condition
nodes
for
episode
of
illness;
linking
two
encounters
for
episode
of
encounter.
|
|
2
|
EVID
EVID
|
provides
evidence
for
|
Indicates
that
the
target
Act
provides
evidence
in
support
of
the
action
represented
by
the
source
Act.
The
target
is
not
a
'reason'
for
the
source
act,
but
rather
gives
supporting
information
on
why
the
source
act
is
an
appropriate
course
of
action.
Possible
targets
might
be
clinical
trial
results,
journal
articles,
similar
successful
therapies,
etc.
Rationale:
Provides
a
mechanism
for
conveying
clinical
justification
for
non-approved
or
otherwise
non-traditional
therapies.
|
|
2
|
EXACBY
EXACBY
|
exacerbated
by
|
Description:The
source
act
is
aggravated
by
the
target
act.
(Example
"chest
pain"
EXACBY
"exercise")
|
|
2
|
EXPL
EXPL
|
has
explanation
|
This
is
the
inversion
of
support.
Used
to
indicate
that
a
given
observation
is
explained
by
another
observation
or
condition.
|
|
2
|
INTF
INTF
|
interfered
by
|
the
target
act
documents
a
set
of
circumstances
(events,
risks)
which
prevent
successful
completion,
or
degradation
of
quality
of,
the
source
Act.
UsageNote:
This
provides
the
semantics
to
document
barriers
to
care
|
|
2
|
ITEMSLOC
ITEMSLOC
|
items
located
|
Items
located
|
|
2
|
LIMIT
LIMIT
|
limited
by
|
A
relationship
that
limits
or
restricts
the
source
act
by
the
elements
of
the
target
act.
For
example,
an
authorization
may
be
limited
by
a
financial
amount
(up
to
$500).
Target
Act
must
be
in
EVN.CRIT
mood.
|
|
2
|
META
META
|
has
metadata
|
Definition:
Indicates
that
the
attributes
and
associations
of
the
target
act
provide
metadata
(for
example,
identifiers,
authorship,
etc.)
for
the
source
act.
Constraint:
Source
act
must
have
either
a
mood
code
that
is
not
"EVN"
(event)
or
its
"isCriterion"
attribute
must
set
to
"true".
Target
act
must
be
an
Act
with
a
mood
code
of
EVN
and
with
isCriterionInd
attribute
set
to
"true".
|
|
2
|
MFST
MFST
|
is
manifestation
of
|
An
assertion
that
a
new
observation
may
be
the
manifestation
of
another
existing
observation
or
action.
This
assumption
is
attributed
to
the
same
actor
who
asserts
the
manifestation.
This
is
stronger
and
more
specific
than
an
inverted
support
link.
For
example,
an
agitated
appearance
can
be
asserted
to
be
the
manifestation
(effect)
of
a
known
hyperthyroxia.
This
expresses
that
one
might
not
have
realized
a
symptom
if
it
would
not
be
a
common
manifestation
of
a
known
condition.
The
target
(cause)
may
be
any
service,
while
the
source
(manifestation)
must
be
an
observation.
|
|
2
|
NAME
NAME
|
assigns
name
|
Used
to
assign
a
"name"
to
a
condition
thread.
Source
is
a
condition
node,
target
can
be
any
service.
|
|
2
|
OUTC
OUTC
|
has
outcome
|
An
observation
that
should
follow
or
does
actually
follow
as
a
result
or
consequence
of
a
condition
or
action
(sometimes
called
"post-conditional".)
Target
must
be
an
observation
as
a
goal,
risk
or
any
criterion.
For
complex
outcomes
a
conjunction
attribute
(AND,
OR,
XOR)
can
be
used.
An
outcome
link
is
often
inverted
to
describe
an
outcome
assessment.
|
|
3
|
(_ActRelationsipObjective)
_ActRelationsipObjective
|
Act
Relationsip
Objective
|
The
target
act
is
a
desired
outcome
of
the
source
act.
Source
is
any
act
(typically
an
intervention).
Target
must
be
an
observation
in
criterion
mood.
|
|
4
|
OBJC
OBJC
|
has
continuing
objective
|
A
desired
state
that
a
service
action
aims
to
maintain.
E.g.,
maintain;
e.g.
keep
systolic
blood
pressure
between
90
and
110
mm
Hg.
Source
is
an
intervention
service.
Target
must
be
an
observation
in
criterion
mood.
|
|
4
|
OBJF
OBJF
|
has
final
objective
|
A
desired
outcome
that
a
service
action
aims
to
meet
finally.
Source
is
any
service
(typically
an
intervention).
Target
must
be
an
observation
in
criterion
mood.
|
|
3
|
GOAL
GOAL
|
has
goal
|
A
goal
that
one
defines
given
a
patient's
health
condition.
Subsequently
planned
actions
aim
to
meet
that
goal.
Source
is
an
observation
or
condition
node,
target
must
be
an
observation
in
goal
mood.
|
|
3
|
RISK
RISK
|
has
risk
|
A
noteworthy
undesired
outcome
of
a
patient's
condition
that
is
either
likely
enough
to
become
an
issue
or
is
less
likely
but
dangerous
enough
to
be
addressed.
|
|
2
|
PERT
PERT
|
has
pertinent
information
|
This
is
a
very
unspecific
relationship
from
one
item
of
clinical
information
to
another.
It
does
not
judge
about
the
role
the
pertinent
information
plays.
|
|
2
|
PREV
PREV
|
has
previous
instance
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
target
act
is
a
predecessor
instance
to
the
source
act.
Generally
each
of
these
instances
is
similar,
but
no
identical.
In
healthcare
coverage
it
is
used
to
link
a
claim
item
to
a
previous
claim
item
that
might
have
claimed
for
the
same
set
of
services.
|
|
2
|
REFR
REFR
|
refers
to
|
A
relationship
in
which
the
target
act
is
referred
to
by
the
source
act.
This
permits
a
simple
reference
relationship
that
distinguishes
between
the
referent
and
the
referee.
|
|
3
|
USE
USE
|
uses
|
Indicates
that
the
source
act
makes
use
of
(or
will
make
use
of)
the
information
content
of
the
target
act.
UsageNotes:
A
usage
relationship
only
makes
sense
if
the
target
act
is
authored
and
occurs
independently
of
the
source
act.
Otherwise
a
simpler
relationship
such
as
COMP
would
be
appropriate.
Rationale:
There
is
a
need
when
defining
a
clinical
trial
protocol
to
indicate
that
the
protocol
makes
use
of
other
protocol
or
treatment
specifications.
This
is
stronger
than
the
assertion
of
"references".
References
may
exist
without
usage,
and
in
a
clinical
trial
protocol
is
common
to
assert
both:
what
other
specifications
does
this
trial
use
and
what
other
specifications
does
it
merely
reference.
|
|
2
|
REFV
REFV
|
has
reference
values
|
Reference
ranges
are
essentially
descriptors
of
a
class
of
result
values
assumed
to
be
"normal",
"abnormal",
or
"critical."
Those
can
vary
by
sex,
age,
or
any
other
criterion.
Source
and
target
are
observations,
the
target
is
in
criterion
mood.
This
link
type
can
act
as
a
trigger
in
case
of
alarms
being
triggered
by
critical
results.
|
|
2
|
RELVBY
RELVBY
|
relieved
by
|
Description:The
source
act
is
wholly
or
partially
alleviated
by
the
target
act.
(Example
"chest
pain"
RELVBY
"sublingual
nitroglycerin
administration")
|
|
2
|
SEQL
SEQL
|
is
sequel
|
An
act
relationship
indicating
that
the
source
act
follows
the
target
act.
The
source
act
should
in
principle
represent
the
same
kind
of
act
as
the
target.
Source
and
target
need
not
have
the
same
mood
code
(mood
will
often
differ).
The
target
of
a
sequel
is
called
antecedent.
Examples
for
sequel
relationships
are:
revision,
transformation,
derivation
from
a
prototype
(as
a
specialization
is
a
derivation
of
a
generalization),
followup,
realization,
instantiation.
|
|
3
|
APND
APND
|
is
appendage
|
An
addendum
(source)
to
an
existing
service
object
(target),
containing
supplemental
information.
The
addendum
is
itself
an
original
service
object
linked
to
the
supplemented
service
object.
The
supplemented
service
object
remains
in
place
and
its
content
and
status
are
unaltered.
|
|
3
|
BSLN
BSLN
|
has
baseline
|
Indicates
that
the
target
observation(s)
provide
an
initial
reference
for
the
source
observation
or
observation
group.
UsageConstraints:
Both
source
and
target
must
be
Observations
or
specializations
thereof.
|
|
3
|
COMPLY
COMPLY
|
complies
with
|
Description:The
source
act
complies
with,
adheres
to,
conforms
to,
or
is
permissible
under
(in
whole
or
in
part)
the
policy,
contract,
agreement,
law,
conformance
criteria,
certification
guidelines
or
requirement
conveyed
by
the
target
act.
Examples
for
compliance
relationships
are:
audits
of
adherence
with
a
security
policy,
certificate
of
conformance
to
system
certification
requirements,
or
consent
directive
in
compliance
with
or
permissible
under
a
privacy
policy.
|
|
3
|
DOC
DOC
|
documents
|
The
source
act
documents
the
target
act.
|
|
3
|
FLFS
FLFS
|
fulfills
|
The
source
act
fulfills
(in
whole
or
in
part)
the
target
act.
Source
act
must
be
in
a
mood
equal
or
more
actual
than
the
target
act.
|
|
4
|
OCCR
OCCR
|
occurrence
|
The
source
act
is
a
single
occurrence
of
a
repeatable
target
act.
The
source
and
target
act
can
be
in
any
mood
on
the
"completion
track"
but
the
source
act
must
be
as
far
as
or
further
along
the
track
than
the
target
act
(i.e.,
the
occurrence
of
an
intent
can
be
an
event
but
not
vice
versa).
|
|
4
|
OREF
OREF
|
references
order
|
Relates
either
an
appointment
request
or
an
appointment
to
the
order
for
the
service
being
scheduled.
|
|
4
|
SCH
SCH
|
schedules
request
|
Associates
a
specific
time
(and
associated
resources)
with
a
scheduling
request
or
other
intent.
|
|
3
|
GEN
GEN
|
has
generalization
|
The
generalization
relationship
can
be
used
to
express
categorical
knowledge
about
services
(e.g.,
(e.g.
amilorid,
triamterene,
and
spironolactone
have
the
common
generalization
potassium
sparing
diuretic).
|
|
3
|
GEVL
GEVL
|
evaluates
(goal)
|
A
goal-evaluation
links
an
observation
(intent
or
actual)
to
a
goal
to
indicate
that
the
observation
evaluates
the
goal.
Given
the
goal
and
the
observation,
a
"goal
distance"
(e.g.,
(e.g.
goal
to
observation)
can
be
"calculated"
and
need
not
be
sent
explicitly.
|
|
3
|
INST
INST
|
instantiates
(master)
|
Used
to
capture
the
link
between
a
potential
service
("master"
or
plan)
and
an
actual
service,
where
the
actual
service
instantiates
the
potential
service.
The
instantiation
may
override
the
master's
defaults.
|
|
3
|
MOD
MOD
|
modifies
|
Definition:
Used
to
link
a
newer
version
or
'snapshot'
of
a
business
object
(source)
to
an
older
version
or
'snapshot'
of
the
same
business
object
(target).
Usage:The
identifier
of
the
Act
should
be
the
same
for
both
source
and
target.
If
the
identifiers
are
distinct,
RPLC
should
be
used
instead.
Name
from
source
to
target
=
"modifiesPrior"
Name
from
target
to
source
=
"modifiesByNew"
|
|
3
|
MTCH
MTCH
|
matches
(trigger)
|
A
trigger-match
links
an
actual
service
(e.g.,
(e.g.
an
observation
or
procedure
that
took
place)
with
a
service
in
criterion
mood.
For
example
if
the
trigger
is
"observation
of
pain"
and
pain
is
actually
observed,
and
if
that
pain-observation
caused
the
trigger
to
fire,
that
pain-observation
can
be
linked
with
the
trigger.
|
|
3
|
OPTN
OPTN
|
has
option
|
A
relationship
between
a
source
Act
that
provides
more
detailed
properties
to
the
target
Act.
The
source
act
thus
is
a
specialization
of
the
target
act,
but
instead
of
mentioning
all
the
inherited
properties
it
only
mentions
new
property
bindings
or
refinements.
The
typical
use
case
is
to
specify
certain
alternative
variants
of
one
kind
of
Act.
The
priorityNumber
attribute
is
used
to
weigh
refinements
as
preferred
over
other
alternative
refinements.
Example:
several
routing
options
for
a
drug
are
specified
as
one
SubstanceAdministration
for
the
general
treatment
with
attached
refinements
for
the
various
routing
options.
|
|
3
|
RCHAL
RCHAL
|
re-challenge
|
Description:A
relationship
in
which
the
target
act
is
carried
out
to
determine
whether
an
effect
attributed
to
the
source
act
can
be
recreated.
|
|
3
|
REV
REV
|
reverses
|
A
relationship
between
a
source
Act
that
seeks
to
reverse
or
undo
the
action
of
the
prior
target
Act.
Example:
A
posted
financial
transaction
(e.g.,
(e.g.
a
debit
transaction)
was
applied
in
error
and
must
be
reversed
(e.g.,
(e.g.
by
a
credit
transaction)
the
credit
transaction
is
identified
as
an
undo
(or
reversal)
of
the
prior
target
transaction.
Constraints:
the
"completion
track"
mood
of
the
target
Act
must
be
equally
or
more
"actual"
than
the
source
act.
I.e.,
when
the
target
act
is
EVN
the
source
act
can
be
EVN,
or
any
INT.
If
the
target
act
is
INT,
the
source
act
can
be
INT.
|
|
3
|
RPLC
RPLC
|
replaces
|
A
replacement
source
act
replaces
an
existing
target
act.
The
state
of
the
target
act
being
replaced
becomes
obselete,
but
the
act
is
typically
still
retained
in
the
system
for
historical
reference.
The
source
and
target
must
be
of
the
same
type.
|
|
3
|
SUCC
SUCC
|
succeeds
|
Definition:
A
new
act
that
carries
forward
the
intention
of
the
original
act,
but
does
not
completely
replace
it.
The
status
of
the
predecessor
act
must
be
'completed'.
The
original
act
is
the
target
act
and
the
successor
is
the
source
act.
|
|
3
|
UPDT
UPDT
|
updates
(condition)
|
A
condition
thread
relationship
specifically
links
condition
nodes
together
to
form
a
condition
thread.
The
source
is
the
new
condition
node
and
the
target
links
to
the
most
recent
node
of
the
existing
condition
thread.
|
|
3
|
XCRPT
XCRPT
|
Excerpts
|
The
source
is
an
excerpt
from
the
target.
|
|
4
|
VRXCRPT
VRXCRPT
|
Excerpt
verbatim
|
The
source
is
a
direct
quote
from
the
target.
|
|
3
|
XFRM
XFRM
|
transformation
|
Used
when
the
target
Act
is
a
transformation
of
the
source
Act.
(For
instance,
used
to
show
that
a
CDA
document
is
a
transformation
of
a
DICOM
SR
document.)
|
|
2
|
SPRT
SPRT
|
has
support
|
Used
to
indicate
that
an
existing
service
is
suggesting
evidence
for
a
new
observation.
The
assumption
of
support
is
attributed
to
the
same
actor
who
asserts
the
observation.
Source
must
be
an
observation,
target
may
be
any
service
(e.g.,
(e.g.
to
indicate
a
status
post).
|
|
3
|
SPRTBND
SPRTBND
|
has
bounded
support
|
A
specialization
of
"has
support"
(SPRT),
used
to
relate
a
secondary
observation
to
a
Region
of
Interest
on
a
multidimensional
observation,
if
the
ROI
specifies
the
true
boundaries
of
the
secondary
observation
as
opposed
to
only
marking
the
approximate
area.
For
example,
if
the
start
and
end
of
an
ST
elevation
episode
is
visible
in
an
EKG,
this
relation
would
indicate
the
ROI
bounds
the
"ST
elevation"
observation
--
the
ROI
defines
the
true
beginning
and
ending
of
the
episode.
Conversely,
if
a
ROI
simply
contains
ST
elevation,
but
it
does
not
define
the
bounds
(start
and
end)
of
the
episode,
the
more
general
"has
support"
relation
is
used.
Likewise,
if
a
ROI
on
an
image
defines
the
true
bounds
of
a
"1st
degree
burn",
the
relation
"has
bounded
support"
is
used;
but
if
the
ROI
only
points
to
the
approximate
area
of
the
burn,
the
general
"has
support"
relation
is
used.
|
|
2
|
SUBJ
SUBJ
|
has
subject
|
Relates
an
Act
to
its
subject
Act
that
the
first
Act
is
primarily
concerned
with.
Examples
The
first
Act
may
be
a
ControlAct
manipulating
the
subject
Act
The
first
act
is
a
region
of
interest
(ROI)
that
defines
a
region
within
the
subject
Act.
The
first
act
is
a
reporting
or
notification
Act,
that
echos
the
subject
Act
for
a
specific
new
purpose.
Constraints
An
Act
may
have
multiple
subject
acts.
Rationale
The
ActRelationshipType
"has
subject"
is
similar
to
the
ParticipationType
"subject",
Acts
that
primarily
operate
on
physical
subjects
use
the
Participation,
those
Acts
that
primarily
operate
on
other
Acts
(other
information)
use
the
ActRelationship.
|
|
3
|
QUALF
QUALF
|
has
qualifier
|
The
target
observation
qualifies
(refines)
the
semantics
of
the
source
observation.
UsageNote:
This
is
not
intended
to
replace
concept
refinement
and
qualification
via
vocabulary.
It
is
used
when
there
are
multiple
components
which
together
provide
the
complete
understanding
of
the
source
Act.
|
|
2
|
SUMM
SUMM
|
summarized
by
|
An
act
that
contains
summary
values
for
a
list
or
set
of
subordinate
acts.
For
example,
a
summary
of
transactions
for
a
particular
accounting
period.
|
|
2
|
VALUE
VALUE
|
has
value
|
Description:Indicates
that
the
target
Act
represents
the
result
of
the
source
observation
Act.
FormalConstraint:
Source
Act
must
be
an
Observation
or
specialization
there-of.
Source
Act
must
not
have
the
value
attribute
specified
UsageNote:
This
relationship
allows
the
result
of
an
observation
to
be
fully
expressed
as
RIM
acts
as
opposed
to
being
embedded
in
the
value
attribute.
For
example,
sending
a
Document
act
as
the
result
of
an
imaging
observation,
sending
a
list
of
Procedures
and/or
other
acts
as
the
result
of
a
medical
history
observation.
The
valueNegationInd
attribute
on
the
source
Act
has
the
same
semantics
of
"negated
finding"
when
it
applies
to
the
target
of
a
VALUE
ActRelationship
as
it
does
to
the
value
attribute.
On
the
other
hand,
if
the
ActRelationship.negationInd
is
true
for
a
VALUE
ActRelationship,
that
means
the
specified
observation
does
not
have
the
indicated
value
but
does
not
imply
a
negated
finding.
Because
the
semantics
are
extremely
close,
it
is
recommended
that
Observation.valueNegationInd
be
used,
not
ActRelationship.negationInd.
OpenIssue:
The
implications
of
negationInd
on
ActRelationship
and
the
valueNegationind
on
Observation.
|
|
1
|
CURE
|
curative
indication
|
curative
indication
|
|
1
|
CURE.ADJ
|
adjunct
curative
indication
|
adjunct
curative
indication
|
|
1
|
MTGT.ADJ
|
adjunct
mitigation
|
adjunct
mitigation
|
|
1
|
RACT
| | |
|
1
|
SUGG
| | |