This
profile
defines
extensions
that
can
be
used
to
provide
alignment
with
the
Event
and
Request
workflow
pattern
data
elements
for
concepts
that
may
be
generally
applicable
but
may
be
sufficiently
uncommon
that
they
are
more
appropriate
to
include
as
extensions
than
as
core
properties
of
the
resource.
See
the
workflow
module
for
more
discussion
about
this
specification
that
are
typically
involved
in
workflow.
Instantiation
extensions
Prior
versions
of
FHIR
had
standard
elements
and
extensions
named
'instantiatesCanonical'
and
'instantiatesUri'.
These
were
intended
to
link
Request
and
Event
resources
to
the
Definition
resources
they
were
based
on.
These
elements
have
now
been
replaced
by
a
number
of
distinct
elements
that
are
more
specific
about
the
exact
nature
of
the
relationship
between
Request/Event
and
Definition.
This
section
provides
additional
guidance
about
how
to
decide
which
relationship
to
use
-
and
what
to
do
if
the
level
of
granularity
conveyed
by
these
extensions
isn't
known
in
the
data
source.
-
'generatedFrom'
is
the
most
straight-forward.
It
is
*only*
used
when
a
Request
resource
is
algorithmically
generated
(by
human
or
software)
from
the
base
Definition
resource.
In
most
cases
a
resource
'generatedFrom'
a
definition
will
also
have
a
'compliesWith'
relationship
(as
it's
unusual
to
generate
from
a
definition
and
not
end
up
compliant
with
it).
However,
because
of
modifications,
it's
possible
to
start
out
compliant
and
not
end
that
way.
It's
also
possible
to
comply
with
a
definition
without
having
been
algorithmically
generated
from
it.
-
'compliesWith'
and
'adheresTo'
are
similar.
However,
they
apply
to
different
types
of
resources.
'compliesWith'
is
for
Request
resources
and
means
that
the
event(s)
resulting
from
the
Request
(if
executed
as
requested)
will
align
with
the
expectations
of
the
Definition.
On
the
other
hand,
'adheresTo'
is
for
Events
and
is
a
direct
assertion
that
the
event
aligns
with
the
expectations
of
the
Definition.
In
both
cases,
the
data
elements
within
the
request/event
have
alignment
with
the
definition.
-
'triggeredBy',
on
the
other
hand,
doesn't
indicate
anything
about
the
data
elements
in
the
Request
or
Event.
It
merely
indicates
that
the
Request
or
Event
resource
came
into
existence
because
the
Definition
said
the
action
was
necessary.
It's
possible
for
protocols
to
define
that
certain
events
need
to
exist
without
describing
exactly
what
they
need
to
look
like.
It's
also
possible
to
describe
the
details
of
resources
without
defining
when
they
need
to
be
created.
-
'shallComplyWith'
only
occurs
for
Request
resources
and
is
a
shortcut
for
defining
the
data
elements
in
the
Request.
Instead
of
providing
details
about
the
code,
product,
timing,
dose,
etc.,
the
Request
simply
includes
a
reference
to
the
Definition
and
says
"do
what
it
says".
The
obligation
is
placed
on
the
system
fulfilling
the
Request
to
determine
how
to
follow
the
protocol.
If
the
specific
type
of
instantiation
isn't
explicit
in
a
mapped
element
from
a
previous
release
or
external
specification,
the
meaning(s)
can
often
be
determined
by
looking
at
the
data,
the
type
of
resource,
and
business
conventions.
'compliesWith'
and
'adheresTo'
can
in
principle
be
validated.
'shallComplyWith'
will
appear
on
requests
that
have
minimal
detail
about
execution.
If
it's
not
possible
to
determine
which
extension,
the
inter-version
extensions
mechanism
can
be
used
to
propoagate
the
old-style
extension
into
a
newer
FHIR
release
or
a
custom
extension
can
be
used.
Additional
guidance
on
these
extensions
External
references
might
be
an
HTML
page,
PDF,
etc.
or
could
just
be
a
non-resolvable
URI
identifier.
The
display
extension
)
on
canonical
can
be
used
to
convey
the
title
of
the
referenced
artifact
in
addition
to
(or
in
place
of)
the
discrete
elements
referencing
it.