Release 5 R6 Ballot (1st Draft)

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0: R5 - STU v6.0.0-ballot1: Release 6 Ballot (1st Draft) (see Ballot Notes ). This is the The current published version in it's permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). is 5.0.0 . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions

Example ArtifactAssessment/example-certainty-rating (Narrative)

Clinical Decision Support Work Group Maturity Level : N/A Standards Status : Informative Compartments : No defined compartments

This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML , JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile ArtifactAssessment .

Generated Narrative: ArtifactAssessment

Resource ArtifactAssessment "example-certainty-rating"

identifier : FEvIR Object Identifier: 27756

date : 2021-11-02T14:48:59.89Z

copyright : https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

artifact : Evidence/18812: Critically appraised summary of all-cause mortality in meta-analysis of RCTs of heparin for moderately ill patients with COVID-19

content

informationType : rating

summary : serious concerns with risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision

type : Overall certainty ( Evidence Certainty Type #Overall)

classifier : Very low quality ( Evidence Certainty Rating #very-low)

author : : Brian S. Alper

freeToShare : true

Components

- InformationType Summary Type Classifier Author
* rating risk of bias in both included trials Risk of bias ( Evidence Certainty Type #RiskOfBias) serious concern ( Evidence Certainty Rating #serious-concern) : Brian S. Alper
* rating high degree of heterogeneity (I-squared 80.7%) with confidence intervals of 2 trial effect estimates barely overlapping Inconsistency ( Evidence Certainty Type #Inconsistency) serious concern ( Evidence Certainty Rating #serious-concern) : Brian S. Alper
* rating Indirectness ( Evidence Certainty Type #Indirectness) no serious concern ( Evidence Certainty Rating #no-concern) : Brian S. Alper
* rating 95% confidence interval includes both large effects and no effects Imprecision ( Evidence Certainty Type #Imprecision) serious concern ( Evidence Certainty Rating #serious-concern) : Brian S. Alper
* rating Publication bias ( Evidence Certainty Type #PublicationBias) no serious concern ( Evidence Certainty Rating #no-concern) : Brian S. Alper

 

 

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.