This
page
is
part
of
the
Snapshot
#3
for
FHIR
Specification
(v4.0.1:
R4
-
Mixed
Normative
and
STU
)
in
it's
permanent
home
(it
will
always
be
available
at
this
URL).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
R5
,
released
to
support
Connectathon
32
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R4B
R4
| FHIR Infrastructure Work Group | Maturity Level : N/A | Standards Status : Informative | Compartments : Not linked to any defined compartments |
This
is
the
narrative
for
the
resource.
See
also
the
XML
,
JSON
4.3.14.379
or
Turtle
format.
Note
that
this
is
the
formal
definition
for
the
implements
operation
as
an
OperationDefinition
on
CapabilityStatement.
See
the
Operation
documentation
Code
System
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/communication-topic
URL: [base]/CapabilityStatement/$implements
URL: [base]/CapabilityStatement/[id]/$implements
Parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
| OUT |
|
|
|
|
The
source
of
operation
does
not
perform
a
full
conformance
check;
in
particular
it
does
not
check
that
the
definition
of
profiles
align.
It
merely
checks
that
the
code
(when
behaviors
the
value
set
draws
in
codes
defined
elsewhere)
Code
The
code
(used
client
wishes
to
use
are
provided
Technically,
this
operation
is
implemented
as
the
code
follows:
If
there
the
capability
statements
match
by
these
rules,
then
the
return
value
is
a
200
OK
with
an
operation
outcome
that
contains
no
display,
implementers
should
not
simply
display
issues
with
severity
>=
error.
If
the
code,
but
map
capability
statement
doesn't
match,
the
concept
into
their
application
Definition
return
value
is
a
4xx
error,
with
an
OperationOutcome
with
at
least
one
issue
with
severity
>=
error
Usage
note:
every
effort
has
been
made
to
ensure
that
the
meaning
examples
are
correct
and
useful,
but
they
are
not
a
normative
part
of
the
concept
Comments
Additional
notes
about
how
to
use
the
code
specification.