Terminology
This
page
is
part
of
the
Snapshot
#3
for
FHIR
Specification
(v4.0.1:
R4
-
Mixed
Normative
and
STU
)
in
it's
permanent
home
(it
will
always
be
available
at
this
URL).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
R5
,
released
to
support
Connectathon
32
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R4B
R4
R3
R2
|
|
Maturity Level : N/A | Standards Status : Informative |
Raw XML ( canonical form + also see XML Format Specification )
nullFlavor
Definition
for
Code
SystemContractPartyRole
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><CodeSystem xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <id value="contract-party-role"/> <meta> <lastUpdated value="2022-12-14T07:12:54.019+11:00"/> <profile value="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/shareablecodesystem"/> </meta> <text> <status value="generated"/> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Each definition includes usage notes explaining the precedence order in contract lifecycle - i.e., while only some stages are required, the order in which they may occur is deterministic; and a map to comparable FHIR and v.3 status codes. It follows guidance about use of status codes in FHIR in <a href="sc.html">the Status Codes Grid</a> . </div> </text> <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg"> <valueCode value="fm"/> </extension> <url value="http://hl7.org/fhir/contract-party-role"/> <identifier> <system value="urn:ietf:rfc:3986"/> <value value="urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.4.1225"/> </identifier> <version value="5.0.0-snapshot3"/> <name value="ContractPartyRole"/> <status value="active"/> <experimental value="true"/> <date value="2017-02-13"/> <publisher value="HL7 International"/> <contact> <name value="FHIR project team"/> <telecom> <system value="url"/>Considerable care must be used when using nullFlavor in this context of FHIR - more than any other concept, this is tied to the way v3 works, and FHIR is quite different. For instance, there is no notion of a "proper value" as opposed to any other value in FHIR. a NullFlavor should be understood to mean, "why information is missing", and the nulFlavors OTH, NINF, PINF, and TRC should not be used. Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces. The definition may point directly to a computable or human-readable definition of the extensibility codes, or it may be a logical URI as declared in some other specification. The definition SHALL be a URI for the Structure Definition defining the extension. Value of extension - must be one of a constrained set of the data types (see [Extensibility](http:// hl7.org/fhir/extensibility.html) for a list). Considerable care must be used when using nullFlavor in this context of FHIR - more than any other concept, this is tied to the way v3 works, and FHIR is quite different. For instance, there is no notion of a "proper value" as opposed to any other value in FHIR. a NullFlavor should be understood to mean, "why information is missing", and the nulFlavors OTH, NINF, PINF, and TRC should not be used.<value value="http://hl7.org/fhir"/> </telecom> </contact> <description value="This CodeSystem contains FHIR-defined contract party role types."/> <jurisdiction> <coding> <system value="http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm"/> <code value="001"/> <display value="World"/> </coding> </jurisdiction> <caseSensitive value="true"/> <content value="complete"/> <concept> <code value="flunky"/> <display value="FLunky"/> <definition value="To be completed"/> </concept> </StructureDefinitionCodeSystem >
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.
FHIR
®©
HL7.org
2011+.
FHIR
Release
4
(Technical
Correction
#1)
(v4.0.1)
R5
Ballot
hl7.fhir.core#5.0.0-snapshot3
generated
on
Fri,
Nov
1,
2019
09:33+1100.
QA
Page
Wed,
Dec
14,
2022
07:13+1100.
Links:
Search
|
Version
History
|
Table
of
Contents
|
Credits
Glossary
|
QA
|
Compare
to
R3
R4B
|
Compare
to
R5
Draft
|
|
Propose
a
change