FHIR Release 3 (STU) R5 Final QA

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.0.2: STU (v5.0.0-draft-final: Final QA Preview for R5 - see ballot notes 3). ). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0 . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R4B R4 R3

Content 4.4.1.759 ValueSet http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/artifactassessment-workflow-status

Clinical Decision Support icon Work Group   Maturity Level : 0 Trial Use Use Context : Country: World, Not yet ready for Production use
Official URL : http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/artifactassessment-workflow-status Version : 5.0.0-draft-final
draft as of 2020-12-28 Computable Name : ArtifactAssessmentWorkflowStatus
Flags : Experimental, Immutable OID : 2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.3157

This value set is used in the following places:

14.4.5 4.4.1.759.1 Definition

Possible values for the workflow status of the comment or assessment, typically used to coordinate workflow around the process of accepting and rejecting changes and comments on the artifact.

4.4.1.759.2 Resource RequestGroup - Examples Content Logical Definition

 

4.4.1.759.3 Expansion

This expansion generated 01 Mar 2023

This value set contains 9 concepts

Expansion based on Artifact Assessment Workflow Status v5.0.0-draft-final (CodeSystem)

XML JSON Turtle Example realization XML Turtle  
Code Clinical Decision Support System Work Group Maturity Level : N/A Display Definition Ballot Status : Informative Compartments : Device , Encounter , Patient , Practitioner , RelatedPerson Canonical Mapping for "Artifact Assessment Workflow Status"
   submitted http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status Submitted

Example List: The comment has been submitted, but the responsible party has not yet been determined, or the responsible party has not yet determined the next steps to be taken.

Simple example request group illustrating related actions with offsets ~ proposed
   triaged example http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status Triaged

The comment has been triaged, meaning the responsible party has been determined and next steps have been identified to address the comment.

~ planned
   waiting-for-input http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status Waiting for Input

The comment is waiting for input from a specific party before next steps can be taken.

~ suspended
   resolved-no-change http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status Resolved - No Change

The comment has been resolved and no changes resulted from the resolution

~ declined
   resolved-change-required http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status Resolved - Change Required

The comment has been resolved and changes are required to address the comment

~ accepted
   deferred http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status Deferred

The comment is acceptable, but resolution of the KDN5 PlanDefinition example comment and application of any associated changes have been deferred

~ suspended
   duplicate kdn5-example http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status Duplicate

The comment is a duplicate of another comment already received

JSON ~ complete
   applied http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status Applied

The comment is resolved and any necessary changes have been applied

~ active
   published http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status Published

The necessary changes to the artifact have been published in a new version of the artifact

~ complete

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that  

See the examples full registry of value sets defined as part of FHIR.

Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

Lvl A few code lists that FHIR defines are correct and useful, but they hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. For value sets, levels are mostly used to organize codes for user convenience, but may follow code system hierarchy - see Code System for further information
Source The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
Code The code (used as the code in the resource instance). If the code is in italics, this indicates that the code is not selectable ('Abstract')
Display The display (used in the display element of a normative part Coding ). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
Definition An explanation of the specification. meaning of the concept
Comments Additional notes about how to use the code