Release 4B 5 Ballot

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v4.3.0: R4B (v5.0.0-ballot: R5 Ballot - STU see ballot notes ). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0 . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3

Conceptmap-103

Example ConceptMap/103 (Narrative)

Vocabulary Work Group Maturity Level : N/A Standards Status : Informative Compartments : Not linked to any defined compartments

This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML , JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile ConceptMap .

SNOMED CT to ICD-10-CM mappings for fracture of ulna (http://hl7.org/fhir/ConceptMap/103)

Mapping from http://snomed.info/sct?fhir_vs to http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/icd-10-us (not specified)

DRAFT (not intended for production usage). Published on 2012-06-13 by HL7, Inc (FHIR project team (example): http://hl7.org/fhir ). Creative Commons 0

Example rule-based mappings between SNOMED CT to ICD-10-CM for fracture of ulna


Source Code Relationship Destination Target Code Comment
Mapping from http://snomed.info/sct|March 2015 US SNOMED CT International Edition to http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/icd-10-us|2015 International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM)
263204007 (Fracture of shaft of ulna) narrower is broader than S52.209A (Unsp fracture of shaft of unsp ulna, init for clos fx) The target mapping to ICD-10-CM is narrower, 'source-is-broader-than-target', since additional patient data on the encounter (initial vs. subsequent) and fracture type is required for a valid ICD-10-CM mapping.
263204007 (Fracture of shaft of ulna) narrower is broader than S52.209D (Unsp fx shaft of unsp ulna, subs for clos fx w routn heal) The target mapping to ICD-10-CM is narrower, 'source-is-broader-than-target', since additional patient data on the encounter (initial vs. subsequent), fracture type and healing (for subsequent encounter) is required for a valid ICD-10-CM mapping.

 

 

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.