This
page
is
part
of
the
FHIR
Specification
(v4.0.1:
R4
-
Mixed
Normative
and
STU
)
in
it's
permanent
home
(it
will
always
be
available
at
this
URL).
(v4.2.0:
R5
Preview
#1).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R5
R4B
R4
R3
| FHIR Infrastructure Work Group | Maturity Level : N/A | Standards Status : Informative | Compartments : Not linked to any defined compartments |
This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML , JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile Questionnaire .
Generated Narrative with Details
id : 54127-6
meta :
contained : ,
url : http://hl7.org/fhir/us/sdc/Questionnaire/54127-6
identifier : 54127-6
title : US Surgeon General - Family Health Portrait
status : active
experimental : true
subjectType : Patient
date
:
01/01/2015
2015
publisher : Regenstrief Institute, Inc and the LOINC Committee
contact :
description : This represents an implementation of the "US Surgeon General family health portrait" form found at https://lforms-demo.nlm.nih.gov
useContext :
jurisdiction : United States of America (Details : {urn:iso:std:iso:3166 code 'US' = 'United States of America)
purpose : Captures basic family history information
copyright : (c) 2015 Regenstrief Institute
approvalDate
:
31/10/2015
2015-10-31
lastReviewDate
:
15/03/2017
2017-03-15
code : US Surgeon General family health portrait [USSG-FHT] (Details: LOINC code 54127-6 = 'US Surgeon General family health portrait [USSG-FHT]', stated as 'US Surgeon General family health portrait [USSG-FHT]')
item
linkId : 0
type : group
Items
- * * * *
item
linkId : 1
definition : http://loinc.org/rdf#54126-8
text : Your health information
type : group
required : true
Items
- * *
item
linkId : 2
definition : http://loinc.org/rdf#54114-4
text : Family member health information
type : group
repeats : true
Items
- *
Other examples that reference this example:
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.