R4 Ballot #1 #2 (Mixed Normative/Trial use)

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.3.0: (v3.5.0: R4 Ballot 2). #2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0 . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R2

4.3.1.43 4.4.1.489 Value Set http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/binding-strength

FHIR Infrastructure Work Group   Maturity Level : 4 5 Normative Use Context : Any

Normative Candidate Note: This page is candidate normative content for R4 in the Conformance Infrastructure Package . Once normative, it will lose it's Maturity Level, and breaking changes will no longer be made.

This is a value set defined by the FHIR project.

Summary

Defining URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/binding-strength
Version: 3.5.0
Name: BindingStrength
Title: BindingStrength
Definition:

Indication of the degree of conformance expectations associated with a binding.

Committee: FHIR Infrastructure Work Group
OID: 2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.43 (for OID based terminology systems)
Source Resource XML / JSON

This value set is used in the following places:

4.3.1.43.1 4.4.1.489.1 Content Logical Definition

This value set includes codes from the following code systems:

 

4.3.1.43.2 4.4.1.489.2 Expansion

This expansion generated 03 Apr 19 Aug 2018

This value set contains 4 concepts

Expansion based on http://hl7.org/fhir/binding-strength version 3.3.0

All codes from system http://hl7.org/fhir/binding-strength

Code Display Definition
required Required To be conformant, the concept in this element SHALL be from the specified value set set.
extensible Extensible To be conformant, the concept in this element SHALL be from the specified value set if any of the codes within the value set can apply to the concept being communicated. If the value set does not cover the concept (based on human review), alternate codings (or, data type allowing, text) may be included instead.
preferred Preferred Instances are encouraged to draw from the specified codes for interoperability purposes but are not required to do so to be considered conformant.
example Example Instances are not expected or even encouraged to draw from the specified value set. The value set merely provides examples of the types of concepts intended to be included.

 

See the full registry of value sets defined as part of FHIR.

Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

Lvl A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. For value sets, levels are mostly used to organize codes for user convenience, but may follow code system hierarchy - see Code System for further information
Source The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
Code The code (used as the code in the resource instance). If the code is in italics, this indicates that the code is not selectable ('Abstract')
Display The display (used in the display element of a Coding ). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
Definition An explanation of the meaning of the concept
Comments Additional notes about how to use the code