This
page
is
part
of
the
FHIR
Specification
(v3.0.2:
STU
3).
(v3.5.0:
R4
Ballot
#2).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R4
R3
Vocabulary
Work
Group
|
Maturity Level : N/A | External | Use Context : Any |
This
value
set
(http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/v3-ActRelationshipType)
(http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActRelationshipType)
is
defined
as
part
of
HL7
v3.
Summary
| Defining URL: |
|
| Version: | 2018-08-12 |
| Name: | v3.ActRelationshipType |
| Title: | v3 Code System ActRelationshipType |
| Definition: |
The source is an excerpt from the target. |
| OID: | 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.10317 (for OID based terminology systems) |
| Source Resource | XML / JSON |
This value set is used in the following places:
This value set includes codes from the following code systems:
http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ActRelationshipType
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipType
This
expansion
generated
19
Apr
2017
Aug
2018
This value set contains 129 concepts
Expansion
based
on
http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ActRelationshipType
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipType
version
2016-11-11
2018-08-12
All
codes
from
system
http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ActRelationshipType
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipType
| Lvl | Code | Display | Definition |
| 0 | ART | act relationship type | Description: A directed association between a source Act and a target Act. Usage Note: This code should never be transmitted in an instance as the value of ActRelationship.typeCode (attribute) |
| 1 | _ActClassTemporallyPertains | ActClassTemporallyPertains | ActClassTemporallyPertains |
| 1 | _ActRelationshipAccounting | ActRelationshipAccounting | Codes that describe the relationship between an Act and a financial instrument such as a financial transaction, account or invoice element. |
| 2 | _ActRelationshipCostTracking | ActRelationshipCostTracking | Expresses values for describing the relationship relationship between an InvoiceElement or InvoiceElementGroup and a billable act. |
| 3 | CHRG | has charge | A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a charge to a clinical act (source). A clinical act may have a charge associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the charge (bill) for delivery or performance of the service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs an organization to perform or deliver a service or product. |
| 3 | COST | has cost | A relationship that provides an ability to associate a financial transaction (target) as a cost to a clinical act (source). A clinical act may have an inherit cost associated with the execution or delivery of the service. The financial transaction will define the cost of delivery or performance of the service. Charges and costs are distinct terms. A charge defines what is charged or billed to another organization or entity within an organization. The cost defines what it costs an organization to perform or deliver a service or product. |
| 2 | _ActRelationshipPosting | ActRelationshipPosting | Expresses values for describing the relationship between a FinancialTransaction and an Account. |
| 3 | CREDIT | has credit | A credit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A credit, once applied (posted), may have either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account credit will decrease the account balance. A non-asset account credit will decrease the account balance. |
| 3 | DEBIT | has debit | A debit relationship ties a financial transaction (target) to an account (source). A debit, once applied (posted), may have either a positive or negative effect on the account balance, depending on the type of account. An asset account debit will increase the account balance. A non-asset account debit will decrease the account balance. |
| 1 | _ActRelationshipConditional | ActRelationshipConditional | Specifies under what circumstances (target Act) the source-Act may, must, must not or has occurred |
| 2 | CIND | has contra-indication | A contraindication is just a negation of a reason, i.e. it gives a condition under which the action is not to be done. Both, source and target can be any kind of service; target service is in criterion mood. How the strength of a contraindication is expressed (e.g., relative, absolute) is left as an open issue. The priorityNumber attribute could be used. |
| 2 | PRCN | has pre-condition | A requirement to be true before a service is performed. The target can be any service in criterion mood. For multiple pre-conditions a conjunction attribute (AND, OR, XOR) is applicable. |
| 2 | RSON | has reason |
Description:
The
reason
or
rationale
for
a
service.
A
reason
link
is
weaker
than
a
trigger,
it
only
suggests
that
some
service
may
be
or
might
have
been
a
reason
for
some
action,
but
not
that
this
reason
requires/required
the
action
to
be
taken.
Also,
as
opposed
to
the
trigger,
there
is
no
strong
timely
relation
between
the
reason
and
the
action.
As
well
as
providing
various
types
of
information
about
the
rationale
for
a
service,
the
RSON
act
relationship
is
routinely
used
between
a
SBADM
act
and
an
OBS
act
to
describe
the
indication
for
use
of
a
medication.
Child
concepts
may
be
used
to
describe
types
of
indication.
Discussion:
In
prior
releases,
the
code
|
| 3 | BLOCK | blocks | Definition: The source act is performed to block the effects of the target act. This act relationship should be used when describing near miss type incidents where potential harm could have occurred, but the action described in the source act blocked the potential harmful effects of the incident actually occurring. |
| 3 | DIAG | diagnoses | Description: The source act is intended to help establish the presence of a (an adverse) situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature. |
| 3 | IMM | immunization against | Description: The source act is intented to provide immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease) |
| 4 | ACTIMM | active immunization against | Description: The source act is intended to provide active immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease) |
| 4 | PASSIMM | passive immunization against | Description: The source act is intended to provide passive immunity against the effects of the target act (the target act describes an infectious disease). |
| 3 | MITGT | mitigates | The source act removes or lessens the occurrence or effect of the target act. |
| 4 | RCVY | recovers | Definition: The source act is performed to recover from the effects of the target act. |
| 3 | PRYLX | prophylaxis of | Description: The source act is intended to reduce the risk of of an adverse situation to emerge as described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature. |
| 3 | TREAT | treats | Description: The source act is intended to improve a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature. |
| 4 | ADJUNCT | adjunctive treatment | Description: The source act is intended to offer an additional treatment for the management or cure of a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature. It is not a requirement that the non-adjunctive treatment is explicitly specified. |
| 4 | MTREAT | maintenance treatment | Description: The source act is intended to provide long term maintenance improvement or management of a pre-existing adverse situation described by the target act. This is not limited to diseases but can apply to any adverse situation or condition of medical or technical nature. |
| 4 | PALLTREAT | palliates | Description: The source act is intended to provide palliation for the effects of the target act. |
| 4 | SYMP | symptomatic relief | Description: The source act is intented to provide symptomatic relief for the effects of the target act. |
| 2 | TRIG | has trigger | A pre-condition that if true should result in the source Act being executed. The target is in typically in criterion mood. When reported after the fact (i.e. the criterion has been met) it may be in Event mood. A delay between the trigger and the triggered action can be specified. Discussion: This includes the concept of a required act for a service or financial instrument such as an insurance plan or policy. In such cases, the trigger is the occurrence of a specific condition such as coverage limits being exceeded. |
| 1 | _ActRelationshipTemporallyPertains | ActRelationshipTemporallyPertains | Abstract collector for ActRelationhsip types that relate two acts by their timing. |
| 2 | _ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsApproximates | ActRelationshipTemporallyPertainsApproximates | Abstract collector for ActRelationship types that relate two acts by their approximate timing. |
| 3 | ENE | ends near end | A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends near the end of the target act's effective time. Near is defined separately as a time interval. Usage Note: Inverse code is ENS |
| 4 | ECW | ends concurrent with | A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends with the end of the target act's effective time. UsageNote: This code is reflexive. Therefore its inverse code is itself. |
| 5 | CONCURRENT | concurrent with | A relationship in which the source act's effective time is the same as the target act's effective time. UsageNote: This code is reflexive. Therefore its inverse code is itself. |
| 5 | SBSECWE | starts before start of, ends with | The source Act starts before the start of the target Act, and ends with the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is SASECWE |
| 3 | ENS | ends near start | A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends near the start of the target act's effective time. Near is defined separately as a time interval. Usage Note: Inverse code is ENE |
| 4 | ECWS | ends concurrent with start of |
The
source
Act
ends
when
the
target
act
starts
(i.e.
if
we
say
|
| 3 | SNE | starts near end | A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts near the end of the target act's effective time. Near is defined separately as a time interval. Usage Note: Inverse code is SNS |
| 4 | SCWE | starts concurrent with end of |
The
source
Act
starts
when
the
target
act
ends
(i.e.
if
we
say
|
| 3 | SNS | starts near start | A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts near the start of the target act's effective time. Near is defined separately as a time interval. Usage Note: Inverse code is SNE |
| 4 | SCW | starts concurrent with | A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts with the start of the target act's effective time. UsageNote: This code is reflexive. Therefore its inverse code is itself. |
| 5 | SCWSEBE | starts with. ends before end of | The source Act starts with.the target Act and ends before the end of the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is SCWSEAE |
| 5 | SCWSEAE | starts with, ends after end of | The source Act starts with the target Act, and ends after the end of the target Act. |
| 2 | EAS | ends after start of | A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act starts. UsageNote: Inverse code is SBE |
| 3 | EAE | ends after end of | A relationship in which the source act ends after the target act ends. UsageNote: Inverse code is EBE |
| 4 | SASEAE | starts after start of, ends after end of | The source Act starts after start of the target Act and ends after end of the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is SBSEBE |
| 5 | SBEEAE | contains end of | The source Act contains the end of the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is EDU |
| 6 | SASSBEEAS | start after start of, contains end of | The source Act start after the start of the target Act, and contains the end of the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is SBSEASEBE |
| 6 | SBSEAE | contains time of | The source Act contains the time of the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is DURING |
| 3 | SAS | starts after start of |
The
source
Act
starts
after
the
start
of
the
target
Act
(i.e.
if
we
say
|
| 4 | SAE | starts after end of | A relationship in which the source act starts after the target act ends. UsageNote: Inverse code is EBS |
| 4 | DURING | occurs during | A relationship in which the source act's effective time is wholly within the target act's effective time (including end points, as defined in the act's effective times) UsageNote: Inverse code is SBSEAE |
| 4 | SASECWE | starts after start of, ends with | The source Act starts after start of the target Act, and ends with the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is SBSECWE |
| 2 | EASORECWS | ends after or concurrent with start of | A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends after or concurrent with the start of the target act's effective time. Usage Note: Inverse code is EBSORECWS |
| 3 | EAEORECW | ends after or concurrent with end of | A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends after or concurrent with the end of the target act's effective time. Usage Note: Inverse code is EBEORECW |
| 2 | INDEPENDENT | independent of time of | The source Act is independent of the time of the target Act. UsageNote: This code is reflexive. Therefore its inverse code is itself. |
| 2 | SAEORSCWE | starts after or concurrent with end of | A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts after or concurrent with the end of the target act's effective time. Usage Note: Inverse code is SBEORSCWE |
| 2 | SASORSCW | starts after or concurrent with start of | A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts after or concurrent with the start of the target act's effective time. Usage Note: Inverse code is SBSORSCW |
| 2 | SBEORSCWE | starts before or concurrent with end of | A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts before or concurrent with the end of the target act's effective time. Usage Note: Inverse code is SAEORSCWE |
| 3 | OVERLAP | overlaps with | A relationship in which the source act's effective time overlaps the target act's effective time in any way. UsageNote: This code is reflexive. Therefore its inverse code is itself. |
| 4 | EDU | ends during | A relationship in which the source act ends within the target act's effective time (including end points, as defined in the act's effective times) UsageNote: Inverse code is SBEEAE |
| 5 | SBSEASEBE | contains start of, ends before end of | The source Act contains the start of the target Act, and ends before the end of the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is SASSBEEAS |
| 4 | SBSEAS | contains start of | The source Act contains the start of the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is SDU |
| 4 | SDU | starts during | A relationship in which the source act starts within the target act's effective time (including end points, as defined in the act's effective times) UsageNote: Inverse code is SBSEAS |
| 3 | SBE | starts before end of |
The
source
Act
starts
before
the
end
of
the
target
Act
(i.e.
if
we
say
|
| 4 | EBE | ends before end of |
The
source
Act
ends
before
the
end
of
the
target
Act
(i.e.
if
we
say
|
| 5 | SBSEBE | starts before start of, ends before end of | The source Act starts before the start of the target Act, and ends before the end of the target Act. UsageNote: Inverse code is SASEAE |
| 6 | EBSORECWS | ends before or concurrent with start of | A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends before or concurrent with the start of the target act's effective time. Usage Note: Inverse code is EASORECWS |
| 7 | EBS | ends before start of | A relationship in which the source act ends before the target act starts. UsageNote: Inverse code is SAE |
| 4 | EBEORECW | ends before or concurrent with end of | A relationship in which the source act's effective time ends before or concurrent with the end of the target act's effective time. Usage Note: Inverse code is EAEORECW |
| 4 | SBSORSCW | starts before or concurrent with start of | A relationship in which the source act's effective time starts before or concurrent with the start of the target act's effective time. Usage Note: Inverse code is SASORSCW |
| 5 | SBS | starts before start of | A relationship in which the source act begins before the target act begins. UsageNote: Inverse code is SAS |
| 1 | AUTH | authorized by | A relationship in which the target act authorizes or certifies the source act. |
| 1 | CAUS | is etiology for | Description: An assertion that an act was the cause of another act.This is stronger and more specific than the support link. The source (cause) is typically an observation, but may be any act, while the target may be any act. Examples: a growth of Staphylococcus aureus may be considered the cause of an abscess contamination of the infusion bag was deemed to be the cause of the infection that the patient experienced lack of staff on the shift was deemed to be a supporting factor (proximal factor) causing the patient safety incident where the patient fell out of bed because the bed-sides had not been put up which caused the night patient to fall out of bed |
| 1 | COMP | has component | The target act is a component of the source act, with no semantics regarding composition or aggregation implied. |
| 2 | CTRLV | has control variable | A relationship from an Act to a Control Variable. For example, if a Device makes an Observation, this relates the Observation to its Control Variables documenting the device's settings that influenced the observation. |
| 2 | MBR | has member | The target Acts are aggregated by the source Act. Target Acts may have independent existence, participate in multiple ActRelationships, and do not contribute to the meaning of the source. UsageNotes: This explicitly represents the conventional notion of aggregation. The target Act is part of a collection of Acts (no implication is made of cardinality, a source of Acts may contain zero, one, or more member target Acts). It is expected that this will be primarily used with _ActClassRecordOrganizer, BATTERY, and LIST |
| 3 | STEP | has step | A collection of sub-services as steps or subtasks performed for the source service. Services may be performed sequentially or concurrently. UsageNotes: Sequence of steps may be indicated by use of _ActRelationshipTemporallyPertains, as well as via ActRelationship.sequenceNumber, ActRelationship.pauseQuantity, Target.priorityCode. OpenIssue: Need Additional guidelines on when each approach should be used. |
| 4 | ARR | arrival | The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source Act entered into the source Act by means of the target Transportation act. |
| 4 | DEP | departure | The relationship that links to a Transportation Act (target) from another Act (source) indicating that the subject of the source Act departed from the source Act by means of the target Transportation act. |
| 2 | PART | has part |
The
source
Act
is
a
composite
of
the
target
Acts.
The
target
Acts
do
not
have
an
existence
independent
of
the
source
Act.
UsageNote:
In
UML
1.1,
this
is
a
|
| 1 | COVBY | covered by | A relationship in which the source act is covered by or is under the authority of a target act. A financial instrument such as an Invoice Element is covered by one or more specific instances of an Insurance Policy. |
| 1 | DRIV | is derived from | Associates a derived Act with its input parameters. E.G., an anion-gap observation can be associated as being derived from given sodium-, (potassium-,), chloride-, and bicarbonate-observations. The narrative content (Act.text) of a source act is wholly machine-derived from the collection of target acts. |
| 1 | ELNK | episodeLink | Expresses an association that links two instances of the same act over time, indicating that the instance are part of the same episode, e.g. linking two condition nodes for episode of illness; linking two encounters for episode of encounter. |
| 1 | EVID | provides evidence for | Indicates that the target Act provides evidence in support of the action represented by the source Act. The target is not a 'reason' for the source act, but rather gives supporting information on why the source act is an appropriate course of action. Possible targets might be clinical trial results, journal articles, similar successful therapies, etc. Rationale: Provides a mechanism for conveying clinical justification for non-approved or otherwise non-traditional therapies. |
| 1 | EXACBY | exacerbated by |
Description:The
source
act
is
aggravated
by
the
target
act.
(Example
|
| 1 | EXPL | has explanation | This is the inversion of support. Used to indicate that a given observation is explained by another observation or condition. |
| 1 | INTF | interfered by | the target act documents a set of circumstances (events, risks) which prevent successful completion, or degradation of quality of, the source Act. UsageNote: This provides the semantics to document barriers to care |
| 1 | ITEMSLOC | items located | Items located |
| 1 | LIMIT | limited by | A relationship that limits or restricts the source act by the elements of the target act. For example, an authorization may be limited by a financial amount (up to $500). Target Act must be in EVN.CRIT mood. |
| 1 | META | has metadata |
Definition:
Indicates
that
the
attributes
and
associations
of
the
target
act
provide
metadata
(for
example,
identifiers,
authorship,
etc.)
for
the
source
act.
Constraint:
Source
act
must
have
either
a
mood
code
that
is
not
|
| 1 | MFST | is manifestation of | An assertion that a new observation may be the manifestation of another existing observation or action. This assumption is attributed to the same actor who asserts the manifestation. This is stronger and more specific than an inverted support link. For example, an agitated appearance can be asserted to be the manifestation (effect) of a known hyperthyroxia. This expresses that one might not have realized a symptom if it would not be a common manifestation of a known condition. The target (cause) may be any service, while the source (manifestation) must be an observation. |
| 1 | NAME | assigns name |
Used
to
assign
a
|
| 1 | OUTC | has outcome |
An
observation
that
should
follow
or
does
actually
follow
as
a
result
or
consequence
of
a
condition
or
action
(sometimes
called
|
| 2 | _ActRelationsipObjective | Act Relationsip Objective | The target act is a desired outcome of the source act. Source is any act (typically an intervention). Target must be an observation in criterion mood. |
| 3 | OBJC | has continuing objective | A desired state that a service action aims to maintain. E.g., keep systolic blood pressure between 90 and 110 mm Hg. Source is an intervention service. Target must be an observation in criterion mood. |
| 3 | OBJF | has final objective | A desired outcome that a service action aims to meet finally. Source is any service (typically an intervention). Target must be an observation in criterion mood. |
| 2 | GOAL | has goal | A goal that one defines given a patient's health condition. Subsequently planned actions aim to meet that goal. Source is an observation or condition node, target must be an observation in goal mood. |
| 2 | RISK | has risk | A noteworthy undesired outcome of a patient's condition that is either likely enough to become an issue or is less likely but dangerous enough to be addressed. |
| 1 | PERT | has pertinent information | This is a very unspecific relationship from one item of clinical information to another. It does not judge about the role the pertinent information plays. |
| 1 | PREV | has previous instance | A relationship in which the target act is a predecessor instance to the source act. Generally each of these instances is similar, but no identical. In healthcare coverage it is used to link a claim item to a previous claim item that might have claimed for the same set of services. |
| 1 | REFR | refers to | A relationship in which the target act is referred to by the source act. This permits a simple reference relationship that distinguishes between the referent and the referee. |
| 2 | USE | uses |
Indicates
that
the
source
act
makes
use
of
(or
will
make
use
of)
the
information
content
of
the
target
act.
UsageNotes:
A
usage
relationship
only
makes
sense
if
the
target
act
is
authored
and
occurs
independently
of
the
source
act.
Otherwise
a
simpler
relationship
such
as
COMP
would
be
appropriate.
Rationale:
There
is
a
need
when
defining
a
clinical
trial
protocol
to
indicate
that
the
protocol
makes
use
of
other
protocol
or
treatment
specifications.
This
is
stronger
than
the
assertion
of
|
| 1 | REFV | has reference values |
Reference
ranges
are
essentially
descriptors
of
a
class
of
result
values
assumed
to
be
|
| 1 | RELVBY | relieved by |
Description:The
source
act
is
wholly
or
partially
alleviated
by
the
target
act.
(Example
|
| 1 | SEQL | is sequel | An act relationship indicating that the source act follows the target act. The source act should in principle represent the same kind of act as the target. Source and target need not have the same mood code (mood will often differ). The target of a sequel is called antecedent. Examples for sequel relationships are: revision, transformation, derivation from a prototype (as a specialization is a derivation of a generalization), followup, realization, instantiation. |
| 2 | APND | is appendage | An addendum (source) to an existing service object (target), containing supplemental information. The addendum is itself an original service object linked to the supplemented service object. The supplemented service object remains in place and its content and status are unaltered. |
| 2 | BSLN | has baseline | Indicates that the target observation(s) provide an initial reference for the source observation or observation group. UsageConstraints: Both source and target must be Observations or specializations thereof. |
| 2 | COMPLY | complies with | Description:The source act complies with, adheres to, conforms to, or is permissible under (in whole or in part) the policy, contract, agreement, law, conformance criteria, certification guidelines or requirement conveyed by the target act. Examples for compliance relationships are: audits of adherence with a security policy, certificate of conformance to system certification requirements, or consent directive in compliance with or permissible under a privacy policy. |
| 2 | DOC | documents | The source act documents the target act. |
| 2 | FLFS | fulfills | The source act fulfills (in whole or in part) the target act. Source act must be in a mood equal or more actual than the target act. |
| 3 | OCCR | occurrence |
The
source
act
is
a
single
occurrence
of
a
repeatable
target
act.
The
source
and
target
act
can
be
in
any
mood
on
the
|
| 3 | OREF | references order | Relates either an appointment request or an appointment to the order for the service being scheduled. |
| 3 | SCH | schedules request | Associates a specific time (and associated resources) with a scheduling request or other intent. |
| 2 | GEN | has generalization | The generalization relationship can be used to express categorical knowledge about services (e.g., amilorid, triamterene, and spironolactone have the common generalization potassium sparing diuretic). |
| 2 | GEVL | evaluates (goal) |
A
goal-evaluation
links
an
observation
(intent
or
actual)
to
a
goal
to
indicate
that
the
observation
evaluates
the
goal.
Given
the
goal
and
the
observation,
a
|
| 2 | INST | instantiates (master) |
Used
to
capture
the
link
between
a
potential
service
|
| 2 | MOD | modifies |
Definition:
Used
to
link
a
newer
version
or
'snapshot'
of
a
business
object
(source)
to
an
older
version
or
'snapshot'
of
the
same
business
object
(target).
Usage:The
identifier
of
the
Act
should
be
the
same
for
both
source
and
target.
If
the
identifiers
are
distinct,
RPLC
should
be
used
instead.
Name
from
source
to
target
=
|
| 2 | MTCH | matches (trigger) |
A
trigger-match
links
an
actual
service
(e.g.,
an
observation
or
procedure
that
took
place)
with
a
service
in
criterion
mood.
For
example
if
the
trigger
is
|
| 2 | OPTN | has option | A relationship between a source Act that provides more detailed properties to the target Act. The source act thus is a specialization of the target act, but instead of mentioning all the inherited properties it only mentions new property bindings or refinements. The typical use case is to specify certain alternative variants of one kind of Act. The priorityNumber attribute is used to weigh refinements as preferred over other alternative refinements. Example: several routing options for a drug are specified as one SubstanceAdministration for the general treatment with attached refinements for the various routing options. |
| 2 | RCHAL | re-challenge | Description:A relationship in which the target act is carried out to determine whether an effect attributed to the source act can be recreated. |
| 2 | REV | reverses |
A
relationship
between
a
source
Act
that
seeks
to
reverse
or
undo
the
action
of
the
prior
target
Act.
Example:
A
posted
financial
transaction
(e.g.,
a
debit
transaction)
was
applied
in
error
and
must
be
reversed
(e.g.,
by
a
credit
transaction)
the
credit
transaction
is
identified
as
an
undo
(or
reversal)
of
the
prior
target
transaction.
Constraints:
the
|
| 2 | RPLC | replaces | A replacement source act replaces an existing target act. The state of the target act being replaced becomes obselete, but the act is typically still retained in the system for historical reference. The source and target must be of the same type. |
| 2 | SUCC | succeeds | Definition: A new act that carries forward the intention of the original act, but does not completely replace it. The status of the predecessor act must be 'completed'. The original act is the target act and the successor is the source act. |
| 2 | UPDT | updates (condition) | A condition thread relationship specifically links condition nodes together to form a condition thread. The source is the new condition node and the target links to the most recent node of the existing condition thread. |
| 2 | XCRPT | Excerpts | The source is an excerpt from the target. |
| 3 | VRXCRPT | Excerpt verbatim | The source is a direct quote from the target. |
| 2 | XFRM | transformation | Used when the target Act is a transformation of the source Act. (For instance, used to show that a CDA document is a transformation of a DICOM SR document.) |
| 1 | SPRT | has support | Used to indicate that an existing service is suggesting evidence for a new observation. The assumption of support is attributed to the same actor who asserts the observation. Source must be an observation, target may be any service (e.g., to indicate a status post). |
| 2 | SPRTBND | has bounded support |
A
specialization
of
|
| 1 | SUBJ | has subject |
Relates
an
Act
to
its
subject
Act
that
the
first
Act
is
primarily
concerned
with.
Examples
The
first
Act
may
be
a
ControlAct
manipulating
the
subject
Act
The
first
act
is
a
region
of
interest
(ROI)
that
defines
a
region
within
the
subject
Act.
The
first
act
is
a
reporting
or
notification
Act,
that
echos
the
subject
Act
for
a
specific
new
purpose.
Constraints
An
Act
may
have
multiple
subject
acts.
Rationale
The
ActRelationshipType
|
| 2 | QUALF | has qualifier | The target observation qualifies (refines) the semantics of the source observation. UsageNote: This is not intended to replace concept refinement and qualification via vocabulary. It is used when there are multiple components which together provide the complete understanding of the source Act. |
| 1 | SUMM | summarized by | An act that contains summary values for a list or set of subordinate acts. For example, a summary of transactions for a particular accounting period. |
| 1 | VALUE | has value |
Description:Indicates
that
the
target
Act
represents
the
result
of
the
source
observation
Act.
FormalConstraint:
Source
Act
must
be
an
Observation
or
specialization
there-of.
Source
Act
must
not
have
the
value
attribute
specified
UsageNote:
This
relationship
allows
the
result
of
an
observation
to
be
fully
expressed
as
RIM
acts
as
opposed
to
being
embedded
in
the
value
attribute.
For
example,
sending
a
Document
act
as
the
result
of
an
imaging
observation,
sending
a
list
of
Procedures
and/or
other
acts
as
the
result
of
a
medical
history
observation.
The
valueNegationInd
attribute
on
the
source
Act
has
the
same
semantics
of
|
| 0 | CURE | curative indication | curative indication |
| 0 | CURE.ADJ | adjunct curative indication | adjunct curative indication |
| 0 | MTGT.ADJ | adjunct mitigation | adjunct mitigation |
| 0 | RACT | ||
| 0 | SUGG |