FHIR Release 3 (STU) R4 Ballot #2 (Mixed Normative/Trial use)

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.0.2: STU 3). (v3.5.0: R4 Ballot #2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0 . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3

Pcd-example-notAuthor

Financial Management Work Group Maturity Level : N/A Ballot Status : Informative Compartments : Not linked to any defined compartments

This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML or , JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile Contract .

The following scenario is based on existing jurisdictional policy and are realized in existing systems in Canada. The default policy is one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios all deal with withdrawal or withholding consent for that purpose. In other jurisdictions, where an express consent model is used (Opt-In), these would examples would contain the phrase "consent to" "consent to" rather than "withhold" "withhold" or "withdraw" "withdraw" consent for.

specific to use-case 5) Withhold or withdraw consent for disclosure of records that were authored by a specific organization (or service delivery location).

Patient "P. "P. van de Heuvel" Heuvel" wishes to have all of the PHI collected at the Good Health Psychiatric Hospital restricted from disclosure to every provider.

 

 

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.