DSTU2 STU 3 Ballot
This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.0.2: DSTU 2). The current version which supercedes this version is

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.6.0: STU 3 Ballot 4). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0 . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R2

Procedure-example.json Raw JSON (

Raw JSON ( canonical form canonical form ) General Procedure Example )

General Procedure Example

{
  "resourceType": "Procedure",
  "id": "example",
  "text": {
    "status": "generated",
    "div": "<div>Routine Appendectomy</div>"

    "div": "<div xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\">Routine Appendectomy</div>"

  },
  "subject": {
    "reference": "Patient/example"
  },
  "status": "completed",
  "code": {
    "coding": [
      {
        "system": "http://snomed.info/sct",
        "code": "80146002",
        "display": "Appendectomy (Procedure)"
      }
    ],
    "text": "Appendectomy"
  },
  "reasonCodeableConcept": {
    "text": "Generalized abdominal pain 24 hours. Localized in RIF with rebound and guarding"
  },

  "reasonCode": [
    {
      "text": "Generalized abdominal pain 24 hours. Localized in RIF with rebound and guarding"
    }
  ],

  "performer": [
    {
      "actor": {
        "reference": "Practitioner/example",
        "display": "Dr Cecil Surgeon"
      }
    }
  ],
  "performedDateTime": "2013-04-05",
  "followUp": [
    {
      "text": "ROS 5 days  - 2013-04-10"
    }
  ],
  "notes": [
    {
      "text": "Routine Appendectomy. Appendix was inflamed and in retro-caecal position"
    }
  ]
}
Usage
note:
every
effort
has
been
made
to
ensure
that
the
examples
are
correct
and
useful,
but
they
are
not
a
normative
part
of
the
specification.
©
HL7.org
2011+.
FHIR
DSTU2
(v1.0.2-7202)
generated
on
Sat,
Oct
24,
2015
07:44+1100.
Links:

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.