FHIR Release 3 (STU) CI-Build

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.0.2: STU 3). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0 . For a full list Continuous Integration Build of available versions, see FHIR (will be incorrect/inconsistent at times).
See the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3

Pcd-example-notOrg.xml

Example Contract/pcd-example-notOrg (XML)

Maturity Level : N/A
Responsible Owner: Financial Management Work Group Ballot Standards Status : Informative Compartments : Not linked to any defined compartments Patient

Raw XML ( canonical form + also see XML Format Specification )

Jump past Narrative

ConsentDirective Example (id = "pcd-example-notOrg")

The following scenario is based on existing jurisdictional policy and are realized in existing systems in Canada. The default policy is one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios all deal with withdrawal or withholding consent for that purpose. In other jurisdictions, where an express consent model is used (Opt-In), these would examples would contain the phrase &quot;consent to&quot; rather than &quot;withhold&quot; or &quot;withdraw&quot; consent for. specific to use-case 3) Withhold or withdraw consent for disclosure to a specific provider organization Patient &quot;P. van de Heuvel&quot; ex-spouse is a Physician that is employed by Good Health Clinic. P. decides that he would like to withdraw/withhold consent to disclose any instance of his health information to Good Health Clinic. <!-- I assume the example given is Canada Infoway wide??? AND I assume it is desired to state that in the Contract.authority element --> <!-- and/or would this [also] go into Contract.domain as a Jurisdiction?? (see the example on UK Pharamacy Juristiction) --> 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


  <!--   made up code-system to represent the set of privacy consent sub-types known and published
   by Canada Infoway   -->
  
     
     
     
     
   
  
 
  
     
       
       
       
       
     
     
   
   
         
           
   
     
   
   
   
   
     
     
     
   
   
   
   
     
     
     
     <!--   I think some think that this should be the pointer to the law by which this consent
       is derived under. Such as http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-21/index.html   -->
   
   

<Contract xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
  <id value="pcd-example-notOrg"/> 
  <text> 
    <status value="generated"/> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The following scenario is based on existing
      jurisdictional policy and are realized in existing systems in Canada. The
       default policy is
      one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios all
       deal with withdrawal
      or withholding consent for that purpose. In other jurisdictions, where an
       express consent
      model is used (Opt-In), these would examples would contain the phrase &quot;consent
       to&quot; rather than
      &quot;withhold&quot; or &quot;withdraw&quot; consent for. <p>  specific to use-case 3) Withhold or withdraw consent
        for disclosure to a specific provider organization </p> <p>  Patient &quot;P. van de Heuvel&quot;
        ex-spouse is a Physician that is employed by Good Health Clinic. P. decides
         that he would
        like to withdraw/withhold consent to disclose any instance of his health
         information to Good
        Health Clinic. </p> 
    </div>   </text>   <issued value="2015-11-18"/>   <!--   not bound by a timeframe - Contract.applies   -->  <subject>     <reference value="Patient/f001"/>     <display value="P. van de Heuvel"/>   </subject>   <authority>     <reference value="Organization/3"/>     <display value="Michigan Health"/>   </authority>   <!--   and/or would this [also] go into Contract.domain as a Jurisdiction?? (see the

   example on UK Pharamacy Juristiction)   -->
  <domain>     <reference value="Location/ukp"/>     <display value="UK Pharmacies"/>   </domain>   <type>     <coding>       <system value="http://loinc.org"/>       <code value="57016-8"/>     </coding>   </type>   <!--   made up code-system to represent the set of privacy consent sub-types known and

   published by Canada Infoway   -->
  <subType>     <coding>       <system value="http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca.org/Consent-subtype-codes"/>       <code value="Opt-In"/>       <display value="Default Authorization with exceptions."/>     </coding>   </subType>   <term>     <type>       <coding>         <!--   made up code system   -->        <system value="http://example.org/fhir/consent-term-type-codes"/>         <code value="withhold-from"/>         <display value="Withhold all data from specified actor entity."/>       </coding>     </type>     <offer>       <topic>         <reference value="Organization/2.16.840.1.113883.19.5"/>         <display value="Good Health Clinic"/>       </topic>       <!--   by not specifying term.actor I assume this means everyone?   -->      <text value="Withhold this order and any results or related objects from any provider."/>     </offer>   </term>   <!--   the terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak   -->  <friendly>     <!--   likely use url pointer to common text   -->    <contentAttachment>       <title value="The terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak."/>     </contentAttachment>   </friendly>   <!--   the legal terms of the consent in lawyer speak   -->  <legal>     <!--   likely use url pointer to common text   -->    <!--   I think some think that this should be the pointer to the law by which this consent

     is derived under. Such as http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-21/index.html
       -->
    <contentAttachment>       <title value="The terms of the consent in lawyer speak."/>     </contentAttachment>   </legal> 


</

Contract

>

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.