This
page
is
part
of
the
Continuous
Integration
Build
of
FHIR
Specification
(v4.0.1:
R4
-
Mixed
Normative
and
STU
)
in
it's
permanent
home
(it
will
always
(will
be
available
incorrect/inconsistent
at
this
URL).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
times).
See
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R5
R4B
R4
R3
Pcd-example-notOrg.xml
Example
Contract/pcd-example-notOrg
(XML)
Raw
XML
(
canonical
form
+
also
see
XML
Format
Specification
)
Jump
past
Narrative
ConsentDirective
Example
(id
=
"pcd-example-notOrg")
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
The following scenario is based on existing
jurisdictional policy and are realized in existing systems in Canada. The default
policy is
one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios all deal with
withdrawal
or withholding consent for that purpose. In other jurisdictions, where an express
consent
<Contract xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<id value="pcd-example-notOrg"/>
<text>
<status value="generated"/> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The following scenario is based on existing
jurisdictional policy and are realized in existing systems in Canada. The
default policy is
one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios all
deal with withdrawal
or withholding consent for that purpose. In other jurisdictions, where an
express consent
model is used (Opt-In), these would examples would contain the phrase "consent
to" rather than
"withhold" or "withdraw" consent for. specific to use-case 3) Withhold or withdraw consent
for disclosure to a specific provider organization Patient "P. van de Heuvel"
ex-spouse is a Physician that is employed by Good Health Clinic. P. decides that
he would
like to withdraw/withhold consent to disclose any instance of his health information
to Good
Health Clinic.
<!-- and/or would this [also] go into Contract.domain as a Jurisdiction?? (see the example
on UK Pharamacy Juristiction) -->
<!-- made up code-system to represent the set of privacy consent sub-types known and published
by Canada Infoway -->
<!-- I think some think that this should be the pointer to the law by which this consent
is derived under. Such as http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-21/index.html -->
to" rather than
"withhold" or "withdraw" consent for. <p> specific to use-case 3) Withhold or withdraw consent
for disclosure to a specific provider organization </p> <p> Patient "P. van de Heuvel"
ex-spouse is a Physician that is employed by Good Health Clinic. P. decides
that he would
like to withdraw/withhold consent to disclose any instance of his health
information to Good
Health Clinic. </p>
</div> </text> <issued value="2015-11-18"/> <subject> <reference value="Patient/f001"/> <display value="P. van de Heuvel"/> </subject> <authority> <reference value="Organization/3"/> <display value="Michigan Health"/> </authority>
<domain> <reference value="Location/ukp"/> <display value="UK Pharmacies"/> </domain> <type> <coding> <system value="http://loinc.org"/> <code value="57016-8"/> </coding> </type>
<subType> <coding> <system value="http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca.org/Consent-subtype-codes"/> <code value="Opt-In"/> <display value="Default Authorization with exceptions."/> </coding> </subType> <term> <type> <coding> <system value="http://example.org/fhir/consent-term-type-codes"/> <code value="withhold-from"/> <display value="Withhold all data from specified actor entity."/> </coding> </type> <offer> <topic> <reference value="Organization/2.16.840.1.113883.19.5"/> <display value="Good Health Clinic"/> </topic> <text value="Withhold this order and any results or related objects from any provider."/> </offer> </term> <friendly> <contentAttachment> <title value="The terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak."/> </contentAttachment> </friendly> <legal>
<contentAttachment> <title value="The terms of the consent in lawyer speak."/> </contentAttachment> </legal>
</
Contract
>
Usage
note:
every
effort
has
been
made
to
ensure
that
the
examples
are
correct
and
useful,
but
they
are
not
a
normative
part
of
the
specification.