This
page
is
part
of
the
Continuous
Integration
Build
of
FHIR
Specification
(v4.0.1:
R4
-
Mixed
Normative
and
STU
)
in
it's
permanent
home
(it
will
always
(will
be
available
incorrect/inconsistent
at
this
URL).
The
current
version
which
supercedes
this
version
is
5.0.0
.
For
a
full
list
of
available
versions,
see
times).
See
the
Directory
of
published
versions
.
Page
versions:
R5
R4B
R4
R3
Responsible
Owner:
Work
Group
FHIR
Infrastructure
|
Standards Status : Informative |
The Conformance Module represents metadata about the datatypes, resources and API features of the FHIR specification and can be used to create derived specifications.
The core FHIR specification describes a set of resources, frameworks and APIs that are used in many different contexts in healthcare. However, there is wide variability between jurisdictions and across the healthcare ecosystem around practices, requirements, regulations, education and what actions are feasible and/or beneficial.
For this reason, the FHIR specification is a "platform specification" - it creates a common platform or foundation on which a variety of different solutions are implemented. As a consequence, this specification usually requires further adaptation to particular contexts of use.
Typically, these adaptations specify:
Note that because of the nature of the healthcare ecosystem, there may be multiple overlapping sets of adaptations - by healthcare domain, by country, by institution, and/or by vendor/implementation.
FHIR provides a set of resources that can be used to represent and share the adaptations listed above in a computable fashion. These resources are collectively called the conformance resources . Although these conformance resources can be used in isolation they are typically used in the context of an Implementation Guide or a Capability Statement :
The content of an Implementation Guide is described using the ImplementationGuide resource, while the capability statement is represented by the CapabilityStatement resource. These two resources make use of the complete set of conformance resources to fully capture the set of adaptations they represent. Note that the CapabilityStatement resource is one of the conformance resources , the first just describing the capabilities of a system, while the latter is the set of all conformance resources, including:
Conformance resources may be used independently, not just within the context of an ImplementationGuide resource or capability statement. See the section Common use cases for examples of such uses.
The conformance resources and their relationships are shown below:
Resources
shown
with
a
dotted
box
are
described
in
other
sections
of
the
specification:
ValueSet
,
ConceptMap
and
StructureMap
are
from
the
section
on
terminology
,
TestScript
is
part
of
the
section
on
Implementer
Support
.
The conformance resources do not represent patient-related data, and as such are less susceptible to data breaching. Some caution is required however:
StructureDefinitions
may
contain
invariants
formulated
as
structured
expressions
that
are
evaluated
by
external
engines
Conformance resources are commonly used as part of an Implementation Guide or CapabilityStatement resource. There are many ways to use the resources independently however, including:
StructureDefinitions
to
claim
conformance
to
the
rules
laid
out
in
those
StructureDefinitions
CapabilityStatement
resources,
effectively
functioning
as
a
discovery
endpoint
for
services
within
an
organization
StructureDefinitions
and
OperationDefinitions
to
generate
code
that
represents
the
structures
as
classes
and
operations
as
remotely
callable
functions
to
provide
an
easier
programming
model
to
a
software
developer.
NamingSystem
resources,
so
vendors
and
implementers
can
quickly
look
up
the
URLs
or
oids
for
a
given
terminology
or
identifier
system.
A
subset
of
Ongoing
feedback
is
welcome
on
all
the
conformance
resources
has
been
tested
and
used
in
production
tooling
and
are
now
normative.
These
include
StructureDefinition
and
ValueSet.
Others,
like
CapabilityStatement,
have
been
used
widely,
but
not
across
all
elements.
As
a
consequence,
these
resource
have
a
considerable
number
of
elements
marked
for
"trial
use",
while
other
parts
are
normative
and
will
no
longer
change
in
a
substantive
way.
resources,
particularly
based
on
implementation
experience.
Other
The
following
resources
are
still
under
development:
in
maintenance
mode:

These
resources
have
been
mainly
used
in
the
tools
used
to
build
the
FHIR
publication,
early-adopter
implementation
guides
and
the
FHIR
Foundation
conformance
The
GraphDefinition
resource
registry.
In
future,
we
expect
is
still
subject
to
see
more
widespread
use
of
these
resources
additional
change
based
on
implementation
experience,
so
is
found
in
validation
tooling,
code-generators
and
more
extensive
model-based
guide
authoring
tools.
the
API
Incubator